(Closed Session items only).
(Closed Session item only)
(Closed Session item only)
Oral Public Comments
The Board welcomes public comments. To comment on non-agenda items, please submit a speaker form (blue card) to the recording secretary prior to the Public Comments section of the agenda. To comment on an agenda item, please submit a speaker form (blue card) to the recording secretary prior to the Action portion of the agenda. Filling out the speaker cards is voluntary, but will assist the Board in efficiently running the meeting. Public comments are limited to three minutes per speaker. If there are numerous persons wishing to make public comments, the President of the Board may decrease the amount of time allotted for each speaker. Please present your comments in a factual and respectful manner. Participants engaging in disorderly conduct may be ordered to leave the meeting. Finally, please be advised that except in limited situations the Board cannot enter into a formal discussion or make a decision in regard to any item not appearing on the agenda. However, the Board or staff may briefly respond to comments or questions from the public; ask clarification questions or make announcements; direct staff to place an item on a future agenda; request staff to report on an issue at a future meeting, or provide reference to staff or otherwise inform members of the public where they can locate additional sources of factual information.
Written Public Comments
If you wish to register your opinion on an item, but not speak, you may fill out a public written statement form (yellow card), and hand it to the recording secretary. Board members will review these forms after the meeting. The information on these cards will be become a part of the public record.
Pursuant to the Brown Act, the Board of Education cannot enter into formal
discussion with individuals making public comments to the Board. The Board cannot
take action on any issues raised during public comments that are not on the meeting
agenda. Individual Board members may respond to public comments during the
Individual Board Member’s Comments section of the agenda.
Pursuant to the Brown Act, the Board of Education cannot enter into formal
discussion with individuals making public comments to the Board. The Board cannot
take action on any issues raised during public comments that are not on the meeting
agenda. Individual Board members may respond to public comments during the
Individual Board Member’s Comments section of the agenda.
Presentation by Executive Cabinet.
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education adopt Resolution #19/20-34: Federal Education Funding in Light of Impacts Associated with COVID-19 Pandemic, as submitted?
INFORMATION:
The California School Boards Association has encouraged all school districts to advocate to state and federal leaders about how schools are being affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. The attached resolution supports the need for additional federal funding to assist school districts with the additional costs incurred as a result of providing significant support for distance learning, mental health support services and meal delivery, while continuing to address existing budget deficits. It is appropriate that the Conejo Valley Unified School District Board of Education calls on our Congressional delegation and the Governor of California to advocate for additional federal funding to prioritize stable public school funding, allowing for the continuance of our District's ability to deliver high-quality education to all students while safeguarding public health.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
MWM:sf
These items are considered routine and will be approved in one action without discussion.
If Board members request that an item be removed from Consent or a citizen wishes to speak
to an item, the item will be considered under Action Items.
Approval of the Minutes:
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve the recommended applicants to serve on the Independent Citizens/ Bond Oversight Committee?
INFORMATION:
Proposition 39 governs the District's general obligation bonds and requires the establishment of an Independent Citizens' Bond Oversight Committee. On November 4, 2014, voters residing within the Conejo Valley Unified School District passed Measure I, a $197,000,000 bond measure that authorizes funding for needed repairs, upgrades, and new construction projects to the District's schools. Proposition 39 required a 55% supermajority for approval; Measure I was passed with a 65.28% approval rate.
State law requires that after a bond authorized under Proposition 39 passed, the local school Board must appoint an Independent Citizens' Bond Oversight Committee to work with the District.
Pursuant to Education Code Section 15278(b), the purpose of the Independent Citizens' Bond Oversight Committee shall be to inform the public concerning the District's expenditure of Measure I bond proceeds; review expenditure reports produced by the District to ensure that Measure I bond proceeds were expended only for the purpose set forth in Measure I; and present to the Board in a public session, an annual written report outlining their activities and conclusions regarding the expenditure of Measure I bond proceeds.
According to the Bylaws, the members will serve a term of two years, commencing as of the date of appointment by the Board. No member shall serve more than three consecutive terms. Members whose terms have expired may continue to serve on the Committee until a successor has been appointed. Vacant positions are recruited in accordance with the Bylaws, and the District advertises in the local newspaper, on its website, and in other customary forums, as well as soliciting appropriate local groups for applications. A subcommittee made up of two Board members appointed by the Board President, and the Superintendent, review applications and make recommendations to the Board. The full Board may approve the recommendations. The deadline to submit an application was April 15, 2020, at 12:00 p.m.
There are two Committee positions to be filled: Two At-Large Community Member positions
After reviewing the applications and conducting interviews, the subcommittee comprised of President Cindy Goldberg, Vice President Jenny Fitzgerald and Superintendent Dr. Mark McLaughlin recommends the Board appoint the following candidates:
The recent resignation of Jordan Lippel, Business Organization Representative, has opened up another position on the Independent Citizens' Bond Oversight Committee. This position will post on Monday, May 18, 2020, and will close on May 29, 2020.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
MWM:sf
The Board of Education will consider the following:
The proposed regular Board meeting dates for the 2020-2021 school year are as follows:
| 2020-2021 Board Meeting Dates |
|
| 2020 | 2021 |
| 8/11/2020 * | 1/5/2021 |
| 9/1/2020 | 1/19/2021 |
| 9/15/2020 | 2/2/2021 |
| 10/6/2020 | 2/16/2021 |
| 10/20/2020 | 3/2/2021 |
| 11/3/2020 | 3/16/2021 |
| 11/17/2020 | 4/20/2021 * |
| 12/1/2020 | 5/4/2021 |
| 12/15/2020 | 5/18/2021 |
| 6/1/2021 | |
| 6/15/2021 | |
* = Off-cycle Board meeting dates due to holidays or non-school days.
Board of Education Meetings will be held on the first and third Tuesdays of the month, beginning with Closed Session at 5:00 p.m.; Open Session at 6:00 p.m. Any exceptions will be agreed upon by the Board of Education and will be posted on the Board's page on the District's website.
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
1. Certificated Service:
A. Establishment / Modification / Elimination of Positions
Order #: No Items.
B. New Employment / Assignment Change / Change in Status: Administrators, Regular/Special Education Teachers, School Psychologists
Order #: R19-326 - R19-329
2. Certificated Service - Exempt:
A. New Employment / Assignment Change / Change in Status: Exempt Specialists
Order #: E19-120
3. Classified Service:
A. Establishment / Modification / Elimination of Positions
Order #: No Items
B. New Employment (Prob to Perm) / Assignment Change / Change in Status
Orders #: C19-582 - C19-592
C. Substitute / Provisional / Additional Assignment / Change in Status
Orders #: C19-593
4. Classified Service - Exempt:
A. Walk-on Coach
Orders #: E19-593
B. Specialist, Proctor, Student Helper, Others
Orders #: C19-594 - C19-595
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve the Memorandum of Understanding between the Conejo Valley Unified School District and the California School Employees Association (CSEA)?
INFORMATION:
The District and CSEA reached the agreement outlined in the attached document regarding the District's response to the coronavirus (COVID -19) epidemic. The District and CSEA agree that continuity of District operations should be maintained, and provisions should be made for District employees who are impacted by the epidemic.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Cost TBD
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by,
Jeanne Valentine
Assistant Superintendent, Human Resources
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve the contracts listed below?
INFORMATION:
Education Code 17604 states “wherever in this code the power to contract is invested in the governing board of the school district or any member thereof, the power may by a majority vote of the board be delegated to its district superintendent, or to any persons that he or she may designate, or if there be no district superintendent then to any other officer or employee of the district that the board may designate. The delegation of power may be limited as to time, money or subject matter or may be a blanket authorization in advance of its exercise, all as the governing board may direct. However, no contract made pursuant to the delegation and authorization shall be valid or constitute an enforceable obligation against the district unless and until the same shall have been approved or ratified by the governing board, the approval or ratification to be evidenced by a motion of the board duly passed and adopted.” Therefore, all contracts are presented to the Board of Education for approval. Contracts over $5,000 will be presented individually as a separate Board agenda item.
|
Company |
Activity |
School |
Amount |
LCAP Goal |
|
Play60 – Cooper Institute |
Fitness Program |
Various |
$0.00 |
1 |
FISCAL IMPACT:
Schools will pay for these activities with site funds and/or PTA/PFA funds.
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by,
Luis Lichtl
Assistant Superintendent, Instructional Services
MWM:LL:ab
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve the recommended school time schedules for the 2020/2021 school year?
INFORMATION:
Each year, the Board of Education approves the school time schedules for the District. Attached is a list of the proposed school time schedules for the 2020/2021 school year. Revisions for the 2020/2021 school year are highlighted in bold print. The adjusted hours have been reviewed by the District Auditor to ensure that instructional minutes meet requirements.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by:
Luis Lichtl, Assistant Superintendent, Instructional Services
MWM:LL:ab
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve the Adult School courses for the 2020/2021 school year?
INFORMATION:
California school districts providing adult education must have their course outlines approved by their local state school board, and on record with the California Department of Education Adult Education office. Section 51056 of the Education Code requires that the Adult Education courses offered by the school districts be approved annually by the State Department of Education.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by,
Luis Lichtl
Assistant Superintendent, Instructional Services
MWM:LL:ab
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education rescind the contract award and reject the bids for pupil transportation services?
INFORMATION:
The Conejo Valley Unified School District publicly advertised a Request for Bids, RFB #2020-01, based on specifications developed by staff. Three (3) contractors submitted responses on March 19, 2020. Subsequent discussion with the bidders revealed a misunderstanding in the specifics of the base of the bid regarding the number of routes and buses available. The District will rescind the award of contract on April 7, 2020, reject all bids and put out another Request for Proposal (RFP) for pupil transportation services.
FISCAL IMPACT:
General Fund: TBD
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by,
Anthony Frutos, CPPB, CPSM
Director, Purchasing
On behalf of,
Victor P. Hayek, Ed.D.
Deputy Superintendent, Business Services
MWM:VPH:TF
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve the under $5,000 Purchase Order Report?
INFORMATION:
The Board of Education expects that purchase orders under $5,000 will be brought forward for approval. The attached report for the period of April 1, 2020, through April 30, 2020, is presented for ratification. Purchase orders have been approved by the department administrator as a necessary expense for the instructional or support program(s).
FISCAL IMPACT:
General Fund: $208,720.35
Adult Education Fund: $3,944.67
Child Development Fund: $2,362.59
Child Dev - Infant/Toddler: $809.59
Cafeteria Fund: $1,333.49
Bond Measure I: $24,213.13
Bond Measure I Endowment: $62,237.53
Developer Donation Fund #2: $6,936.17
TOPASS Fund: $6,274.00
Worker Compensation Fund: $216.18
Health & Welfare Fund: $309.62
Private Purpose Trust Fund: $712.00
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by,
Anthony Frutos, CPPB, CPSM
Director, Purchasing
On behalf of,
Victor P. Hayek, Ed.D.
Deputy Superintendent, Business Services
MWM:VPH:AF:ls
|
|