(Closed Session items only).
Student #12-18/19 SA
(Closed Session item only)
(Closed Session item only)
(Closed Session item only)
Oral Public Comments
The Board welcomes public comments. To comment on non-agenda items, please submit a speaker form (blue card) to the recording secretary prior to the Public Comments section of the agenda. To comment on an agenda item, please submit a speaker form (blue card) to the recording secretary prior to the Action portion of the agenda. Filling out the speaker cards is voluntary, but will assist the Board in efficiently running the meeting. Public comments are limited to three minutes per speaker. If there are numerous persons wishing to make public comments, the President of the Board may decrease the amount of time allotted for each speaker. Please present your comments in a factual and respectful manner. Participants engaging in disorderly conduct may be ordered to leave the meeting. Finally, please be advised that except in limited situations the Board cannot enter into a formal discussion or make a decision in regard to any item not appearing on the agenda. However, the Board or staff may briefly respond to comments or questions from the public; ask clarification questions or make announcements; direct staff to place an item on a future agenda; request staff to report on an issue at a future meeting, or provide reference to staff or otherwise inform members of the public where they can locate additional sources of factual information.
Written Public Comments
If you wish to register your opinion on an item, but not speak, you may fill out a public written statement form (yellow card), and hand it to the recording secretary. Board members will review these forms after the meeting. The information on these cards will be become a part of the public record.
Pursuant to the Brown Act, the Board of Education cannot enter into formal
discussion with individuals making public comments to the Board. The Board cannot
take action on any issues raised during public comments that are not on the meeting
agenda. Individual Board members may respond to public comments during the
Individual Board Member’s Comments section of the agenda.
Pursuant to the Brown Act, the Board of Education cannot enter into formal
discussion with individuals making public comments to the Board. The Board cannot
take action on any issues raised during public comments that are not on the meeting
agenda. Individual Board members may respond to public comments during the
Individual Board Member’s Comments section of the agenda.
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education of the Conejo Valley Unified School District approve the 2019/2020 Local Control and Accountability Plan, inclusive of the Budget Overview for Parents and the Federal Addendum, as submitted?
INFORMATION:
In June 2013, the California Legislature enacted the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF), the first major revision to the State's education funding formula in over 40 years. As a component of the LCFF legislation, the Legislature required that all school districts develop a Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP). The LCAP is intended to be a strategic planning document detailing the school district's planned goals, actions and expenditures to improve student outcomes and performance. It is to be developed with extensive input and feedback from the stakeholder groups in the school district and community.
A draft LCAP must be presented for a public hearing prior to the adoption of the annual school district budget, and must be approved by the local Board of Education (Board) at the same meeting at which the annual budget is approved. The LCAP must be written and presented to stakeholders and the Board of Education utilizing a template and format created by the California Department of Education. The LCAP must address all of the State's education priorities, including Conditions of Learning, Pupil Outcomes and Engagement.
This past school year, District administrative staff met with each school principal to discuss their site’s student performance data and Single Plan for Student Achievement in an effort to attain alignment to our District’s LCAP. Also, the LCAP was discussed with the District Advisory Council (DAC) as it relates to student and parent engagement, LCAP goals, LCAP actions and services. The Assistant Superintendent of Instructional Services provided an LCAP update during the May DAC meeting.
As part of the ongoing process, LCAP presentations and updates were made available to the School Board on a monthly basis. Finally, the Assistant Superintendent of Instructional Services previewed a proposed Fiscal Year (FY) 2019 LCAP update on May 21, 2019.
As noted with the LCAP proposed updates given to the Board on May 21, 2019, a public hearing will be held for community input on June 4, 2019. Concurrently, the proposed budget will also be presented for information and public participation. A copy of the full 2019/2020 LCAP draft is currently posted on the District's website www.conejousd.org and is available for review upon request. Board action adopting the 2019/2020 LCAP and budget will occur on June 18, 2019.
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by,
Luis Lichtl
Assistant Superintendent, Instructional Services
MWM:LL:ab
ISSUE:
Following a public hearing on June 4, 2019, to receive comment on the 2019-2020 Proposed Budget, should the Board of Education approve the 2019-2020 Proposed Budget?
INFORMATION:
The Education Code requires the Board of Education adopt a budget no later than June 30 for the next fiscal year. Notice of a Public Hearing must be duly published and posted in accordance with District procedures.
The Proposed Budget is available in the District Offices and on the Board of Education meeting agenda, which is available on the District website at www.conejousd.org. The 2019-2020 Budget is based upon revenue projections reflecting the information received from the Governor’s proposed 2019-2020 budget and the Governor’s May revise budget adjustments.
Until the Legislature approves the provisions of the May Revise and the Governor signs those provisions, the District must use the May revision to project its budget. Once these provisions have been approved by the Legislature and signed by the Governor, the District may have to make appropriate modifications to the Proposed Budget. Upon the Governor signing the Final State Budget, further discussions concerning budget issues will need to take place, and if necessary, a detailed presentation will be made at that time.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Estimated General Fund Revenues: $188,311,667
Projected General Fund Expenses: $195,172,440
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by,
Susan Tucker
Director, Fiscal Services
On behalf of
Victor P. Hayek, Ed.D.
Deputy Superintendent, Business Services
MWM:VPH:ST:mo
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education adopt Resolution #18/19-31: Approval of Education Protection Account (EPA) Spending Plan 2019-2020?
INFORMATION:
Proposition 30, The Schools and Local Public Safety Protection Act of 2012, approved by the voters on November 6, 2012, temporarily increased the state's sales tax rate for all taxpayers and the personal income tax rates for upper-income taxpayers. A portion of the new revenues are to be used to increase school funding, with the remainder helping to balance the state budget.
The new revenues generated from Proposition 30 are deposited into a newly created state account called the Education Protection Account (EPA). School districts, county offices of education, and charter schools (LEAs) will receive funds from the EPA based on their proportionate share of the statewide revenue limit amount, which includes charter school general purpose funding. A corresponding reduction is made to an LEA’s revenue limit or charter school general purpose state aid equal to the amount of their EPA entitlement.
Proposition 30 specifies that LEAs may not use EPA funds for salaries or benefits of administrators or any other administrative costs. The CDE has interpreted that administrative costs, as used in Proposition 30, mean anything defined as administration in the California School Accounting Manual. Administrative costs include general administration, school administration, and instructional administration:
The language of Proposition 30 requires that each LEA " . . . shall have sole authority to determine how the moneys received from the Education Protection Account are spent in the school or schools within its jurisdiction, provided, however, that the appropriate governing board or body shall make these spending determinations in open session of a public meeting of the governing board or body and shall not use any of the funds from the Education Protection Account for salaries or benefits of administrators or any other administrative costs."
Proposition 30 requires all districts, counties, and charter schools to report on their websites an accounting of how much money was received from the EPA and how that money was spent.
FISCAL IMPACT:
$3,553,468 allocated to certificated salaries
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by,
Susan Tucker
Director, Fiscal Services
On behalf of
Victor P. Hayek, Ed.D.
Deputy Superintendent, Business Services
MWM:VPH:ST:mo
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve the Warrants list(s) for May 2019?
INFORMATION:
Warrant summary(s) for May includes warrants paid for the period of May 1, 2019, through May 31, 2019. Expenditures outlined in the attachments are in accordance with the 2018/2019 Budget Parameters. Expenses recorded for each fund will increase by the dollar amount listed, including payroll reports.
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by,
Susan Tucker
Director, Fiscal Services
on behalf
Victor P. Hayek, Ed.D.
Deputy Superintendent, Business Services
MWM:VPH:ST:mo
These items are considered routine and will be approved in one action without discussion.
If Board members request that an item be removed from Consent or a citizen wishes to speak
to an item, the item will be considered under Action Items.
Approval of the Minutes:
1. Certificated Service:
A. Establishment / Modification / Elimination of Positions
Order #: R18-267
B. New Employment / Assignment Change / Change in Status: Administrators, Regular/Special Education Teachers, School Psychologists
Order #: R18-268 - R18-277
2. Certificated Service - Exempt:
A. New Employment / Assignment Change / Change in Status: Exempt Specialists
Order #: E18-088
3. Classified Service:
A. Establishment / Modification / Elimination of Positions
Order #: C18-880 - C18-899
B. New Employment (Prob to Perm) / Assignment Change / Change in Status
Orders #: C18-900 - C18-917
C. Substitute / Provisional / Additional Assignment / Change in Status
Orders #: C18-918 - C18-922
4. Classified Service - Exempt:
A. Walk-on Coach
Orders #: E18-1260 - E18-1263
B. Campus Supervisor, Proctor, Specialist, Student Helper, Others
Orders #: E18-1264 - E18-1269
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve a Stipulated Agreement for student #12-18/19 SA who was recommended for expulsion commencing on May 31, 2019?
INFORMATION:
On or about May 22, 2019, a student violated the following Education Code:
E.C. 48900 (c) Unlawfully possessed, used, sold, or otherwise furnished, or been under the influence of, a controlled substance listed in Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 11053) of Division 10 of the Health and Safety Code, an alcoholic beverage, or an intoxicant of any kind.
A meeting was held with the Student and Parent on May 24, 2019, to discuss the recommendation and interim educational alternatives. A Stipulated Agreement was entered into with the Parent and Student.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by,
Luis Lichtl
Assistant Superintendent, Instructional Services
MWM:LL:ab
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education readmit student #2-18/19 E who was expelled commencing on December 18, 2018?
INFORMATION:
On January 22, 2019, the Board of Education approved to expel student #2-18/19 E. The student violated the following Education Code:
E.C. 48900 (b) Possessed, sold, or otherwise furnished a firearm, knife, explosive, or other dangerous object, unless, in the case of possession of an object of this type, the pupil had obtained written permission to possess the item from a certificated school employee, which is concurred in by the principal or the designee of the principal.
E.C. 48900 (h) Possessed or used tobacco, or products containing tobacco or nicotine products, including,but not limited to, cigarettes, cigars, miniature cigars, clove cigarettes, tobacco, snuff, chew packets, and betel. However, this section does not prohibit use or possession by a pupil of his or her own prescription products.
E.C. 48900 (j) Unlawfully possessed or unlawfully offered, arranged, or negotiated to sell drug paraphernalia, as defined in Section 11014.5 of the Health and Safety Code.
The student was allowed to participate in the Gateway Community Day School and BreakThrough Program. The student was eligible to apply for readmission on or after June 7, 2019, pending completion of the BreakThrough Program.
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by,
Luis Lichtl
Assistant Superintendent, Instructional Services
MWM:LL:ab
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve the contracts listed below?
INFORMATION:
Education Code 17604 states “wherever in this code the power to contract is invested in the governing board of the school district or any member thereof, the power may by a majority vote of the board be delegated to its district superintendent, or to any persons that he or she may designate, or if there be no district superintendent then to any other officer or employee of the district that the board may designate. The delegation of power may be limited as to time, money or subject matter or may be a blanket authorization in advance of its exercise, all as the governing board may direct. However, no contract made pursuant to the delegation and authorization shall be valid or constitute an enforceable obligation against the district unless and until the same shall have been approved or ratified by the governing board, the approval or ratification to be evidenced by a motion of the board duly passed and adopted.” Therefore, all contracts are presented to the Board of Education for approval. Contracts over $5,000 will be presented individually as a separate Board agenda item.
|
Company |
Activity |
School |
Amount |
LCAP Goal |
|
Matt Steinberg Reptile Family |
Assembly |
CON |
300.00 |
1 |
|
Vermont Volunteers Historical Assn |
Presentation |
COL |
600.00 |
1 |
FISCAL IMPACT:
Schools will pay for these activities with site funds and/or PTA/PFA funds.
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by,
Luis Lichtl
Assistant Superintendent, Instructional Services
MWM:LL:ab
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Ventura County Indian Education Consortium?
INFORMATION:
The Ventura County Indian Education Consortium, as part of Ventura Unified School District, receives federal funds to preserve the heritage of Native American students in Ventura County and the cultural history of our region. Each district is asked to consider a district-supported format of matching funds to provide experienced teachers and counselors who teach individual/small group lessons to support cultural identity and awareness for eligible Native American students, or classroom presentations and on-site teacher workshops on Native American themes.
FISCAL IMPACT:
$9,950.80 from General Fund and Title I funds.
Respectfully submitted:
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by,
Luis Lichtl
Assistant Superintendent, Instructional Services
MWM:LL:ab
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve the contract with California Association for Bilingual Education (CABE) to provide Spanish-speaking parents and guardians the opportunity to learn about the American Education School System in a 12-module research-based course provided by a qualified trainer from CABE?
INFORMATION:
This would be year two of the parent engagement program, Project 2Inspire, which includes two courses; Mastery Level 2 and Expert Level 3. Each course is designed specifically for immigrant parents and/or guardians who are learning to navigate the complexities of the American Education School System. The content of the course includes topics that are proven to introduce parents to be active participants and collaborators of their children’s education and then become leaders in their own community (see attachment for description of each course).
FISCAL IMPACT:
$35,000 to be paid by Title III, Immigration Education Program (O530)
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by,
Deborah Martinez, Ed.D.
Coordinator, English Learner Services
On behalf of
Sonia Wilson
Director, Elementary Education and Title I Program Implementation
On behalf of
Luis Lichtl
Assistant Superintendent, Instructional Services
MWM:LL:DM:SW:sh
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve a three-year contract with Ellevation Education in order to continue the implementation of a progressive data-driven approach to effectively progress monitor the linguistic and academic progress of every active English Learner and Reclassified as Fluent English Proficient (RFEP) student in CVUSD?
INFORMATION:
ELLevation software was implemented three years ago and is a student information system, specifically for English Learners. The English language proficiency results and all relevant academic data is contained in ELLevation for federal programming compliance and program improvement purposes. The State criteria to reclassify students from English Learner to Fluent English Proficient is closely monitored, allowing leaders to provide effective English Learner instruction and systems of support.
FISCAL IMPACT:
$53,914.29 to be paid by Economic Impact Aid (EIA) funds (0530).
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by,
Deborah Martinez, Ed.D.
Coordinator, English Learner Services
On behalf of
Sonia Wilson
Director, Elementary Education and Title I Program Implementation
On behalf of
Luis Lichtl
Assistant Superintendent, Instructional Services
MWM:LL:DM:SW:sh
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve the licensing agreement with ExploreLearning Gizmos for the 2019-20 school year?
INFORMATION:
The purchase of Gizmos licenses for students, which was piloted on a limited bases during the 2018/19 school, is requested for the 2019-20 school year. These supplemental materials support NGSS and our Science curriculum throughout CVUSD and are essential to enhance student learning. Through this cutting edge technology, teachers facilitate and students use online labs and discovery activities to build a deep understanding of the various focus areas of science. Various middle and high school science classrooms have been using Gizmos for the past two years and have requested to further build capacity and opportunity for our students. This item was approved in our LCAP as goal 1A4.
FISCAL IMPACT:
$31,406.44 from the General Fund.
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by,
Brian Mercer
Director, High Schools & Assessment
On behalf of
Luis Lichtl
Assistant Superintendent, Instructional Services
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve a contract for residential placement for Student #33-18/19?
INFORMATION:
Special Education classes and services for Student #33-18/19 cannot be met by the District and/or County at this time. Therefore, in order to provide placement of this student at the recommended educational setting, a contract number must be established for the period of 5/30/2019, through 6/30/2019. The total cost for this residential placement is $17,208.49, less reimbursement (from SELPA Mental Health Fund) of $11,370.00, and less District income of $703.20. The total District cost is $5,135.29.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Special Education Fund: $5,135.29.
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by,
Erika Johnson
Director, Special Education
On behalf of
Lisa A. Miller, Ed.D.
Assistant Superintendent, Student Support Services
MWM:LAM:EJ:ks
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve the Memorandum of Understanding with the Sandy Hook Promise Foundation?
INFORMATION:
The Sandy Hook Promise Foundation will provide the District with access to two of their "Know the Signs" programs, "Say Something" and "Start with Hello." The programs are designed to teach students how to look for warning signs from peers who may want to harm themselves or others; and to teach students to create a culture of social inclusion on school campuses.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None - Program is fully funded by Sandy Hook Promise Foundation.
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by,
Lisa A. Miller, Ed.D.
Assistant Superintendent, Student Support Services
MWM:LAM:kp
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve the amended contract with 3Chords, Inc., d/b/a Therapy Travelers?
INFORMATION:
3Chords, Inc., d/b/a Therapy Travelers is a non-public agency that contracts with Ventura County Special Education Local Plan Area (SELPA) and the Ventura County Office of Education (VCOE) for the purpose of providing special education and/or related services to school districts in Ventura County. Conejo Valley Unified School District's Special Education Department entered into a contract with 3Chords, Inc., d/b/a Therapy Travelers on March 26, 2019, to hire temporary occupational therapists through June 30, 2019. At this time, we need to amend the contract to include the time period covering, July 1, 2019, through July 10, 2019, so that 3Chords, Inc. can provide the same services during Conejo Valley Unified's Special Education Extended School Year Program.
FISCAL IMPACT:
$10,200 to be paid by the Special Education Extended School Year fund.
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by,
Erika Johnson
Director, Special Education
On behalf of
Lisa A. Miller, Ed.D.
Assistant Superintendent, Student Support Services
MWM:LAM:EJ:ks
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve the amended contract with STAR of CA Behavioral and Psychological Services, DBA ERA ED?
BACKGROUND:
STAR of CA Behavioral and Psychological Services, DBA ERA ED, is a non-public agency that provides contractors trained in both Intensive Behavioral Supports (BII) and Behavioral Intervention Development (BID) services. These services are needed in our District during Special Education's Extended School Year Program, June 12, 2019, through July 10, 2019, to satisfy education services to students in grades preschool through post-secondary identified as needing BII and BID services.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Approximately $10,000 to be paid by the Special Education Extended School Year fund.
Respectfully submitted:
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by:
Erika Johnson
Director of Special Education
on behalf of
Lisa A. Miller, Ed.D.
Assistant Superintendent, Student Support Services
MWM:LAM:EJ:ks
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve the 2018-2019 School Wellness Policy Annual Report?
INFORMATION:
This is an annual report of the CVUSD Student Wellness Coordinators' achievements meeting goals for 2018-2019 as required by the Student Wellness Board Policy 5030.
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by,
Virginia Beck
Director, Child Nutrition
On behalf of
Victor P. Hayek, Ed.D.
Deputy Superintendent, Business Services
MWM:VPH:VB:mo
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education adopt Resolution #18/19-25: Approval of Expense Transfers for the 2019-2020 fiscal year?
INFORMATION:
In order to allow for the normal flow of business, it is necessary that the attached Resolution for expense transfers for the 2019-2020 fiscal year be approved and forwarded to the Ventura County Superintendent of Schools Office. Continuing reports will be provided to the Board of Education on a regular basis reflecting budget transfers.
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by,
Susan Tucker
Director, Fiscal Services
On behalf of
Victor P. Hayek, Ed.D.
Deputy Superintendent, Business Services
MWM:VPH:ST:mo
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education adopt Resolution #18/19-26: Approval of Inter-fund Transfers for the 2019-2020 fiscal year?
INFORMATION:
In order to allow for the normal flow of business, it is necessary that the attached Resolution for inter-fund transfers for the 2019-2020 fiscal year be approved and forwarded to the Ventura County Superintendent of Schools Office. Continuing reports will be provided to the Board of Education on a regular basis reflecting inter-fund transfers.
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by,
Susan Tucker
Director, Fiscal Services
On behalf of
Victor P. Hayek, Ed.D.
Deputy Superintendent, Business Services
MWM:VPH:ST:mo
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education adopt Resolution #18/19-27: Approval of Appropriation Transfers for fiscal year 2019-2020?
INFORMATION:
In order to allow for the normal flow of business, it is necessary that the attached Resolution for appropriation transfers for the 2019-2020 fiscal year be approved and forwarded to the Ventura County Superintendent of Schools Office. Continuing reports will be provided to the Board of Education on a regular basis reflecting budget transfers.
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by,
Susan Tucker
Director, Fiscal Services
On behalf of
Victor P. Hayek, Ed.D.
Deputy Superintendent, Business Services
MWM:VPH:ST:mo
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education adopt Resolution #18/19-28: Approval of Year-End Budget Transfers for Fiscal Year 2018-2019?
INFORMATION:
At the close of the school year, the District, with the consent of the Board of Education, may request the County Superintendent of Schools to make any transfers between the undistributed reserve and any expenditure classification or classifications as necessary to permit the payment of obligations the District incurred during the school year. Any necessary transfers made will be brought to the Board of Education for approval at the next regularly scheduled meeting following the required transfer.
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by,
Susan Tucker
Director, Fiscal Services
On behalf of
Victor P. Hayek, Ed.D.
Deputy Superintendent, Business Services
MWM:VPH:ST:mo
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education adopt Resolution #18/19-29: Approval of Authorization to Improve Compensation for Certain Categories of Employees after July 1, 2019?
INFORMATION:
Compensation schedules for each year are maintained on file at the Ventura County Superintendent of Schools Office. Board approved compensation schedules must be forwarded by July 1 for the following fiscal year in order for payrolls to be issued. If the District wishes to maintain the flexibility to improve compensation schedules for non-represented employees after July 1, 2019, formal Board of Education action is required. Represented employees' compensation may be revised, including retroactivity, through contract negotiations, and this resolution is not necessary for those groups. The attached resolution would allow the Board of Education the right to improve the compensation of non-represented employees on or after July 1, 2019, if they so desire.
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by,
Susan Tucker
Director, Fiscal Services
On behalf of
Victor P. Hayek, Ed.D.
Deputy Superintendent, Business Services
MWM:VPH:ST:mo
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve Resolution #18/19-30: Approval of Temporary Loans Between District Funds for the 2019-2020 Fiscal Year?
INFORMATION:
In order to meet cash flow needs, it is necessary that the attached resolution for temporary loans between District funds be approved for the 2019-2020 fiscal year. In accordance with Education Code Section 42603, this transfer shall be accounted for as temporary borrowing between funds or accounts and shall not be available for appropriation or be considered income to the borrowing fund or account. Continuing reports will be provided to the Board of Education on a regular basis reflecting cash transfers.
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by,
Susan Tucker
Director, Fiscal Services
On behalf of
Victor P. Hayek, Ed.D.
Deputy Superintendent, Business Services
ANB:VPH:ST:mo
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve a blanket authorization for Contract Change Orders not to exceed statutory limits for summer construction work?
INFORMATION:
Pursuant to Public Contract Code 20118.4, the Board of Education may authorize changes to Public Works Contracts without the formality of securing bids if the cost does not exceed ten percent (10%) of the original contract price or the legal bid limit of $15,000, whichever amount is greater. Normal practice is to present all contractual changes which fall under these parameters to the Board of Education for approval as they occur. However, the brief time frame allocated for summer work and the summer schedule of Board meetings impacts the ability of the Business Services department to authorize payments for work performed on a timely basis. It is therefore requested that the Board of Education provide blanket authorization to the Business Services department to process change orders which do not exceed the statutory limits set forth in Public Contract Code 20118.4. This authorization would be granted only for the period of June 1, 2019, through September 30, 2019.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Change orders, if required, cannot exceed the statutory limit of ten percent (10%) of contract value or $15,000 (whichever amount is greater) under this authorization.
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by,
Tim McCabe
Director, Planning and Construction
On behalf of
Victor P. Hayek, Ed.D.
Deputy Superintendent, Business Services
MWM:VPH:TM:mo
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve the Annual Signature Authorization for the 2019-2020 fiscal year?
INFORMATION:
Education Code Section 42633 requires that at the beginning of each fiscal year, or after any reorganization or staff change, school districts need to declare the agents authorized to sign orders, warrants, contracts, documents, etc. A statement of authorized agents, along with a verified signature, must be filed with School Business and Advisory Services of the Ventura County Office of Education, as any changes occur.
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by,
Victor P. Hayek, Ed.D.
Deputy Superintendent, Business Services
MWM:VPH:mo
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve the agreement with the Ventura County Office of Education for the ESCAPE Financial and Payroll/Personnel System?
INFORMATION:
The Ventura County Office of Education (VCOE) hosts the financial and payroll/personnel system that serves the Conejo Valley Unified School District. Executing this agreement continues services vital to the operations of the District, without interruption.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Fees are based on Actual Daily Attendance (ADA) and will be invoiced and payable by no later than December 2019. Current estimate: $177,673.40 from the General Fund.
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by,
Victor P. Hayek, Ed.D.
Deputy Superintendent, Business Services
MWM:VPH:mo
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve the contracts for legal services for July 1, 2019, through June 30, 2020?
INFORMATION:
From time to time, the District requires the assistance of legal firms for consultation and representation for District matters. The District relies on a number of different law firms depending on specialty, history of the District, and general knowledge of related matters. The following legal firms are presented for 2019-2020 (in alphabetical order):
FISCAL IMPACT:
Varies depending on use.
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by,
Victor P. Hayek, Ed.D.
Deputy Superintendent, Business Services
MWM:VPH:mo
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve the Child Nutrition Programs Department to provide meal service for BRIDGES Charter School and MATES Charter School during the school year 2019-2020?
INFORMATION:
The Charter Schools will act as their own "Food Authority" with the California Department of Education (CDE), submitting an annual application to the CDE, accepting and approving their student's Meal Benefit applications and filing monthly claims for reimbursement. The Charter Schools will purchase breakfast and lunch from CVUSD, but provide their own labor for serving students.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Estimated income, after expenses, for Child Nutrition Fund: $70,000 annually
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by,
Virginia Beck
Director, Child Nutrition
On behalf of
Victor P. Hayek
Deputy Superintendent, Business Services
MWM:VPH:VB:mo
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve the Facilities Agreement with BRIDGES Charter School at the former Park Oaks Elementary School site?
INFORMATION:
On October 31, 2018, BRIDGES Charter School submitted a request for facilities under Proposition 39 pursuant to Cal. Admin. Code, title 5, § 11969.9(c). The Charter School’s request for facilities was based upon a projected total ADA of 342.95. On November 30, 2018, the District, under Cal. Admin. Code, title 5, § 11969.9(d), responded to BRIDGES’ facilities request and stated that it would not issue a counter-projection to the Charter School’s projections.
Education Code § 47614 and the implementing regulations obligate the District to offer space sufficient to accommodate the Charter School’s in-District students. However, continuing the practice offered by the District years ago, the District will base its facilities offer on the Charter School’s total classroom ADA, including out-of-District students. The Facilities Agreement grants use of facilities, furnishings and equipment at Park Oaks Elementary School, located at 1335 Calle Bouganvilla, Thousand Oaks, CA, 91360, through the 2020 school year.
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by,
Victor P. Hayek, Ed.D.
Deputy Superintendent, Business Services
MWM:VPH:mo
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve the Facilities Agreement with MATES Charter School (formerly Meadows Elementary School)?
BACKGROUND:
On October 26, 2018, MATES Charter School made a written request for facilities for the 2019-2022 school years. On November 30, 2018, the District, under Cal. Admin. Code, title 5, § 11969.9(d), responded to the facilities request and stated that it would not issue a counter-projection to the Charter School’s projections.
Education Code § 47614 and the implementing regulations obligate the District to offer space sufficient to accommodate the Charter School’s in-District students. The three-year agreement grants the use of facilities, furnishings and equipment at the former Meadows Elementary School, located at 2000 La Granada Dr., Thousand Oaks, CA 91362, through the 2022 school year with an annual pro rata adjustment.
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by,
Victor P. Hayek, Ed.D.
Deputy Superintendent, Business Services
MWM:VPH:mo
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve the Compromise and Release and/or Stipulated Awards?
INFORMATION:
The District Workers' Compensation insurance plan is a self-insured plan run by the District. When losses occur, the District's third party administrator handles the claims. Cases are reviewed and assessed and brought forward for settlement based on the recommendation of the third party administrator and (when applicable) the attorney representing the District. The following case(s) are brought forward for settlement:
Claim No: COEN-004691 Compromise & Release/Stipulated Award
FISCAL IMPACT:
Workers' Compensation Fund: estimated $5,000
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by,
Victor P. Hayek, Ed.D.
Deputy Superintendent, Business Services
MWM:VPH:mo
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve the Warrants list(s) for May 2019?
INFORMATION:
The Warrant summary(s) for May includes warrants paid for the period of May 1, 2019, through May 31, 2019. Expenditures outlined in the attachments are in accordance with the 2018/2019 Budget Parameters. Expenses recorded for each fund will increase by the dollar amount listed, including payroll reports.
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by,
Susan Tucker
Director, Fiscal Services
On behalf of
Victor P. Hayek, Ed.D.
Deputy Superintendent, Business Services
MWM:VPH:ST:mo
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve the Transfer of Funds Summary(s) for the month of May 2019?
INFORMATION:
Transfers within the budget are necessary as District operations and demands change. Appropriations, expenditures, revenues, and carryover funds are moved within the budget and may affect fund balance. The Transfer of Funds Summary(s) includes total funds moved within the General Fund for the period of May 1, 2019, through May 31, 2019.
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by,
Susan Tucker
Director, Fiscal Services
On behalf of
Victor P. Hayek, Ed.D.
Deputy Superintendent, Business Services
MWM:VPH:ST:mo
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education accept the donations and gifts as listed on the May 1 to June 13, 2019, gift and donation report?
INFORMATION:
In accordance with Conejo Valley Unified School District Board Policy 3290, gifts to the District must be approved and accepted by the Board of Education. The Conejo Valley Unified School District is grateful for the community support and appreciates each donation. The District thanks the community for the continued support of our schools!
FISCAL IMPACT:
Total deposited to the General Fund on this report: $12,053.64
Total deposited to the General Fund for 2018-19: $181,460.19.
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by,
Victor P. Hayek, Ed.D.
Deputy Superintendent, Business Services
MWM:VPH:mo
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve the contract extension with VCEdNet to provide internet access?
INFORMATION:
The Federal E-Rate program provides discounts for schools and libraries when purchasing telecommunication services, and computer networking services and hardware. The E-Rate program will provide a discount of approximately 50% to subsidize our school district contracts with Internet service providers. The District currently contracts with VCedNet, a department within the Ventura County Office of Education, to provide a 4Gbps Internet connection. VCEdNet has provided the District with a proposal to extend our current contract with an annual net cost of $38,418. The annual gross cost of the service is $76,836.
FISCAL IMPACT:
General Fund: $38,418
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by,
David Hubbard
Director, Technology Services
On behalf of
Victor P. Hayek, Ed.D.
Deputy Superintendent, Business Services
MWM:VPH:DH:sb
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve the Excess Workers' Compensation Insurance coverage with Arch Insurance Company?
INFORMATION:
The Conejo Valley Unified School District is self-insured for Workers' Compensation insurance. The District absorbs the first $600k of any claim and carries excess coverage should a claim be significant enough to exceed the threshold. The District worked with our broker and solicited quotes from multiple carriers. Arch Insurance Company had the most competitive quote, which represents a savings of approximately $23k from the current year premium.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Workers Compensation Fund: $137,239
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by,
Victor P. Hayek, Ed.D.
Deputy Superintendent, Business Services
MWM:VPH:mo
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve the 60-month lease for the SendPro P Series high capacity mailing system?
INFORMATION:
The SendPro P Series mail system will be utilized at the District Operations Office (750 Mitchell Rd., Newbury Park), for processing outgoing mail. The lease will cover a period of 60 months beginning July 1, 2019, through June 30, 2024.
An evaluation/demonstration was provided by several vendors on multiple machine options. The SendPro P Series mail system was found to be the best option to sustain the District's needs and align with our upcoming departmental moves.
FISCAL IMPACT:
General Fund: $376.94 per month / $22,616.40 total for 5-year lease
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by,
Jon Aasted
Director, Purchasing
On behalf of
Victor P. Hayek, Ed.D.
Deputy Superintendent, Business Services
MWM:VPH:JA:ls
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve the 60-month lease for the digital mailing system (DM400C)?
INFORMATION:
The digital mail system (DM400C) will be utilized at the District Education Office (1400 E. Janss Rd., Thousand Oaks) for processing outgoing mail. The lease will cover a period of 60 months beginning July 1, 2019, through June 30, 2024. This system will replace a larger mail machine that is currently at the District Office, which recently came off lease.
An evaluation/demonstration was provided by several vendors on multiple machine options. The DM400C was found to be the best option to sustain our District's needs and align with our upcoming departmental moves.
FISCAL IMPACT:
General Fund: $146.14 per month / $8,768.40 total for 5-year lease
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by,
Jon Aasted
Director, Purchasing
On behalf of
Victor P. Hayek, Ed.D.
Deputy Superintendent, Business Services
MWM:VPH:JA:ls
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education award the Landscape Beautification project at Weathersfield Elementary School, to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder?
INFORMATION:
A cohesive beautification upgrade and enhancement of exterior spaces was identified on the Master Plan for the Weathersfield ES campus. The Conejo Valley Unified School District publicly advertised for bids for the Weathersfield ES landscape beautification improvements project. Five (5) contractors attended the mandatory pre-bid job walk on May 15, 2019. Three (3) of the contractors who attended the mandatory job walk submitted bids for this project on the June 4, 2019, deadline. Bid results are listed below, and the lowest responsive and responsible bid is shown in bold.
|
Contractor |
Base Bid |
Allowance |
Total Bid |
|
United Construction & Landscape |
$347,000.00 |
$40,000.00 |
$387,000.00 |
|
Ardalan Construction Company, Inc. |
$369,000.00 |
$40,000.00 |
$409,000.00 |
|
Golden Phoenix Construction Company |
$522,000.00 |
$40,000.00 |
$562,000.00 |
FISCAL IMPACT:
Bond Measure I: $387,000.00
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by,
Tim McCabe,
Director, Planning and Construction
On behalf of
Victor P. Hayek, Ed.D.
Deputy Superintendent, Business Services
MWM:VPH:TM:dmh
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve participation in bids/contracts of other public agencies, (school districts, cities, and government agencies), cooperatives, purchasing contracts (piggyback), California Multiple Awards Schedule (CMAS), and other approved California State contracts, when applicable, for the 2019-2020 fiscal year?
INFORMATION:
Many public agencies and other school districts agree to permit school districts to “piggyback” on their bids and contracts. This allows for cooperative purchasing by many state agencies. Purchases made by this authorization are typically for supplies, equipment, consumable materials, furniture and miscellaneous items. This does not preempt a school district the right to bid and procure on its own, but provides alternate resources. Authorization to participate does not include facilities improvement, construction or Public Works projects.
Per Public Contract Code 20118.2(a): Due to the highly specialized and unique nature of technology, telecommunications, related equipment, software, and services, because products and materials of that nature are undergoing rapid technological changes, and in order to allow for the introduction of new technological changes into the operations of the school district, it is in the public’s best interest to allow a school district to consider, in addition to the price, factors such as vendor financing, performance reliability, standardization, life-cycle costs, delivery timetables, support logistics, the broadest possible range of competing products and materials available, fitness of purchase, manufacturer’s warranties, and similar factors in the award of contracts for technology, telecommunications, related equipment, software, and services. This section only applies to procurement, and not construction. Subsections of PCC 20118.1 and 20118.2(d) authorize school districts to procure such products through competitive negotiations.
FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by,
Jon Aasted
Director, Purchasing
On behalf of
Victor P. Hayek, Ed.D.
Deputy Superintendent, Business Services
MWM:VPH:JA:ls
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve Addendum #18 to the Agreement with Durham School Services, L.P. for transportation services for the 2019-2020 fiscal year?
INFORMATION:
On September 18, 2002, the Conejo Valley Unified School District entered into an agreement with Durham School Services, L.P. to furnish home-to-school pupil transportation, special education transportation, and other student transportation services. The 2019-2020 fees reflect a 2.7% adjustment (March 2019 Consumer Price Index increase).
FISCAL IMPACT:
General Fund: approximately $2,574,175
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by,
Janet Boland
Transportation Specialist
On behalf of
Victor P. Hayek, Ed.D.
Deputy Superintendent, Business Services
MWM:VPH:jb
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve the under $5,000 Purchase Order Report?
INFORMATION:
The Board of Education expects that purchase orders under $5,000 will be brought forward for approval. The attached report for period of May 1, 2019, through May 31, 2019, is presented for approval. Purchase Orders have been approved by the department administrator as a necessary expense for the instructional or support program(s).
FISCAL IMPACT:
2018-2019
General Fund: $226,856.11
Adult Education Fund: $19,100.74
Child Development Fund: $8,813.53
Child Dev - Infant/Toddler: $1,952.00
Cafeteria Fund: $6,539.90
Bond Measure I: $57,658.93
Bond Measure I Endowment: $403.90
Developer Donation Fund #2: $1,695.00
TOPASS Fund: $7,911.26
Worker Compensation Fund: $387.56
Health & Welfare Fund: $368.32
Private Purpose Trust Fund: $4,100.00
2019-2020
Child Development Fund: $18,372.74
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by,
Jon Aasted
Director, Purchasing
On behalf of
Victor P. Hayek, Ed.D.
Deputy Superintendent, Business Services
MWM:VPH:JA:ls
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve the over $5,000 Purchase Order Report?
INFORMATION:
The Board of Education expects that purchase orders exceeding $5,000 will be brought forward for approval. The attached report for the period of May 29, 2019, through June 11, 2019, is presented for approval. Purchase orders have been approved by the department administrator as a necessary expense for the instructional or support program.
FISCAL IMPACT:
2018-2019
General Fund: $569,876.23
Bond Measure I: $604,634.00
Developer Donation Fund #2: $7,108.00
TOPASS Fund: $38,344.38
Worker Compensation Fund: $65,833.37
2019-2020
General Fund: $1,816,321.87
Adult Education Fund: $195,332.44
Bond Measure I: $1,025,671.38
TOPASS Fund: $30,000.00
Worker Compensation Fund: $1,690,000.00
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by,
Jon Aasted
Director, Purchasing
On behalf of
Victor P. Hayek, Ed.D.
Deputy Superintendent, Business Services
MWM:VPH:JA:ls
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education authorize the execution and filing of a Notice of Completion for the contracts and projects awarded by the Conejo Valley Unified School District?
INFORMATION:
The Conejo Valley Unified School District entered into contracts, for various projects, that are complete and has been inspected by District staff, as follows:
|
Site |
Contract Date |
Type* |
Project Description Major Project # |
Purchase Order Number |
Contract Amount – Funding Source |
Contractor |
|
|
Thousand Oaks HS |
January 18, 2019 |
MMR |
Library Furniture MP18/19-57-TOH |
B19-01832 |
$31,272.81 MI |
Yamada Enterprises |
|
|
Conejo Valley Unified School District – 750 Mitchell Rd |
December 19, 2018 |
MMR |
Roof Restoration MP18/19-5552-DOW |
B19-01791 |
$139,886 DD |
Falcon Roofing Company |
|
|
Banyan ES |
April 30, 2019 |
SS |
Fencing MP18/19-571-BAN |
B19-01995 |
$18,167 MI |
Magnum Fence and Security, Inc. |
|
|
*ITIN: Instructional Technology and Network Infrastructure – MMR: Modernization, Maintenance and Repairs – SMCL: Science, Mathematics Career Preparation Lab – SS: Safety & Security |
|||||||
FISCAL IMPACT:
Bond Measure I: $49,439.81
Developer Donation Fund #2: $139,886
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by,
Tim McCabe
Director, Planning and Construction
On behalf of
Victor P. Hayek, Ed.D.
Deputy Superintendent, Business Services
MWM:VPH:TM:dmh
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve the disposal of surplus and obsolete equipment?
INFORMATION:
The items listed on the attached pages are surplus or obsolete. Some items have become unserviceable and/or cost more to repair than they are worth. Governing Board Policy 3270, Sale and Disposal of Personal Property, authorizes the Director of Purchasing to advertise, sell, auction, dispose or donate obsolete and surplus District-owned personal property per the attached list. Unless otherwise directed, any proceeds from the sale of items will be deposited into the general fund.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by,
Jon Aasted
Director, Purchasing
On behalf of
Victor P. Hayek, Ed.D.
Deputy Superintendent, Business Services
MWM:VPH:JA:lb
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve the amendment of Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 3100 – Budget?
INFORMATION:
CVUSD receives updates to Board Policies and Administrative Regulations from GAMUT. GAMUT is a policy update service offered through the California School Boards Association (CSBA) which provides information about new laws and court opinions which may affect Board Policies, Administrative Regulations, and Board Bylaws.
The amendment of Board Policy 3100 reflects new law (AB 1808), which requires districts to annually develop, adopt, and post an LCFF budget overview for parents/guardians and to file the budget overview with the county superintendent of schools. The section on "Long-Term Financial Obligations" was revised to reflect new law (SB 1413), which establishes the California Employers' Pension Prefunding Trust Program to allow districts to prefund required contributions to the California Public Employees' Retirement System. The amendment of Administrative Regulation 3100 emphasizes that any recommendations by the budget advisory committee should be consistent with the district's vision, goals, priorities, LCAP, and other comprehensive plans, and to clarify that a regional budget review committee convened by the county superintendent of schools requires approval of the Superintendent of Public Instruction as well as the District Board.
LEGEND:
Black/Bold – new language from GAMUT
Black/Bold/Italics – new language created by CVUSD staff
Red – notes provided for information only
Strikeouts – language recommended for removal
Submitted by:
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by:
Victor P. Hayek, Ed.D.
Deputy Superintendent, Business Services
MWM:VPH:mo
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve the amendment of Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 3260 – Fees and Charges?
INFORMATION:
CVUSD receives updates to Board Policies and Administrative Regulations from GAMUT. GAMUT is a policy update service offered through the California School Boards Association (CSBA) which provides information about new laws and court opinions which may affect Board Policies, Administrative Regulations, and Board Bylaws.
The amendment to Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 3260 adds a new section called "Collection of Debt," which reflects new law (AB 1974) which prohibits negative action against a student or former student for a debt owed to the school and requires districts to provide parents/guardians with an itemized invoice that references applicable district policies. The Regulation is also revised to more directly reflect the most recent CDE fiscal advisory regarding student fees.
LEGEND:
Black/Bold – new language from GAMUT
Black/Bold/Italics – new language created by CVUSD staff
Red – notes provided for information only
Strikeouts – language recommended for removal
Submitted by:
Mark W. McLaughlin Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by:
Victor P. Hayek, Ed.D.
Deputy Superintendent, Business Services
MWM:VPH:mo
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve the amendment of Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 3515.4 – Recovery for Property Loss or Damage?
INFORMATION:
CVUSD receives updates to Board Policies and Administrative Regulations from GAMUT. GAMUT is a policy update service offered through the California School Boards Association (CSBA) which provides information about new laws and court opinions which may affect Board Policies, Administrative Regulations, and Board Bylaws.
The amendment to Board Policy 3515.4 reflects the 2019 limits for parent/guardian liability for property loss or damage caused by a child's willful misconduct and for any reward paid for information leading to the identification of persons responsible for property damage. The Administrative Regulation is updated to reflect the requirement to offer an option for a student to provide work in lieu of payment when the parents/guardians are unable to pay, and AB 1974 which allows the district, at its discretion, to offer any student, regardless of ability to pay, a nonmonetary means to settle debt. The Regulation also adds a paragraph allowing the district to withhold a student's grades, diplomas, or transcripts until the damages have been recovered. The section on "Payment of Reward" has been deleted and key concepts have been moved to the Board Policy.
LEGEND:
Black/Bold – new language from GAMUT
Black/Bold/Italics – new language created by CVUSD staff
Red – notes provided for information only
Strikeouts – language recommended for removal
Submitted by:
Mark W. McLaughlin Ed.D.
Superintendent
Prepared by:
Victor P. Hayek, Ed.D.
Deputy Superintendent, Business Services
MWM:VPH:mo
Current Board topics staff are working on and anticipated date(s) to bring information back to the Board:
Approval of Core Literature Books: (Aug 2019)
Other Topics:
FUTURE BOARD MEETINGS
AUGUST 20, 2019
5:00 p.m. Closed Session
6:00 p.m. Open Session
Location: Conejo Valley High School (CVUSD Board Room), 1402 E. Janss Road, Thousand Oaks
For a copy of this agenda and additional information, please visit the CVUSD website.
Internet Home Page: www.conejousd.org/
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
In compliance with the ADA, if you need special assistance, including assisted listening devices, to participate in this meeting or other services in conjunction with this meeting, please contact the Superintendent’s Office at (805) 497-9511 ext. 201. Upon request, the agenda and documents in this agenda packet can be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist our staff in assuring reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service.