(Closed Session items only).
Oral Public Comments
The Board welcomes public comments. To comment on non-agenda items, please submit a speaker form (blue card) to the recording secretary prior to the Public Comments section of the agenda. To comment on an agenda item, please submit a speaker form (blue card) to the recording secretary prior to the Action portion of the agenda. Filling out the speaker cards is voluntary, but will assist the Board in efficiently running the meeting. Public comments are limited to three minutes per speaker. If there are numerous persons wishing to make public comments, the President of the Board may decrease the amount of time allotted for each speaker. Please present your comments in a factual and respectful manner. Participants engaging in disorderly conduct may be ordered to leave the meeting. Finally, please be advised that except in limited situations the Board cannot enter into a formal discussion or make a decision in regard to any item not appearing on the agenda. However, the Board or staff may briefly respond to comments or questions from the public; ask clarification questions or make announcements; direct staff to place an item on a future agenda; request staff to report on an issue at a future meeting, or provide reference to staff or otherwise inform members of the public where they can locate additional sources of factual information.
Written Public Comments
If you wish to register your opinion on an item, but not speak, you may fill out a public written statement form (yellow card), and hand it to the recording secretary. Board members will review these forms after the meeting. The information on these cards will be become a part of the public record.
Pursuant to the Brown Act, the Board of Education cannot enter into formal
discussion with individuals making public comments to the Board. The Board cannot
take action on any issues raised during public comments that are not on the meeting
agenda. Individual Board members may respond to public comments during the
Individual Board Member’s Comments section of the agenda.
Pursuant to the Brown Act, the Board of Education cannot enter into formal
discussion with individuals making public comments to the Board. The Board cannot
take action on any issues raised during public comments that are not on the meeting
agenda. Individual Board members may respond to public comments during the
Individual Board Member’s Comments section of the agenda.
ISSUE:
Shall the Board of Education approve the amendment to the agreement between the Conejo Valley Unified School District (“District”) and National University for a Memorandum of Understanding for educational field experience for the term of July 1, 2017, through July 1, 2018?
BACKGROUND:
National University has established an approved program of special training to provide teaching experience through supervised teaching to students enrolled in teacher training curricula. The amendment to the previous student teacher agreement covers the many types of field experience practices offered through National University’s School of Education, including student teaching, intern teaching, clear/induction field experience, school counseling and school psychology fieldwork, administrative services preliminary, clear and intern field experience. This program requires supervision and facilities where students can obtain the clinical learning experience required in the curriculum. The District has the clinical setting, supervision and equipment needed by National University trainees as part of their practical learning experience.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve the amendment to the agreement for the National University Memorandum of Understanding for educational field experience.
2. Do not approve the amendment to the agreement for the National University Memorandum of Understanding for educational field experience.
RECOMMENDATION:
Alternative #1.
RATIONALE:
The District wishes to continue to collaborate with National University in the educational process of future educators.
Respectfully submitted and prepared by,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Interim Superintendent
MWM:sf
ISSUE:
Shall the Board of Education approve the agreement between the Conejo Valley Unified School District (“District”) and Phillips Graduate University ("PGU") for a School Psychology and School Counseling Internship Program for the term of 08/25/2017 through 08/25/2021?
PGU has established an approved program of special training to provide counseling experience through supervised counseling to students enrolled in teacher training curricula. This program requires supervision and facilities where students can obtain the clinical learning experience required in the curriculum. The District has the clinical setting, supervision and equipment needed by PGU trainees as part of their practical learning experience.
ALTERNATIVES:
RECOMMENDATION:
Alternative #1.
RATIONALE:
The District wishes to continue to collaborate with Phillips Graduate University in the educational process of future School Psychologists and Counselors.
Respectfully submitted and prepared by,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Interim Superintendent
MWM:sf
ISSUE:
Shall the Board of Education approve the agreement between the Conejo Valley Unified School District (“District”) and California State University, Northridge (“CSUN”) for a Student Teacher Program for the term of September 2017 through September 2021?
CSUN has established an approved program of special training to provide teaching experience through supervised internships to students enrolled in teacher training curricula. This program requires supervision and facilities where students can obtain the clinical learning experience required in the curriculum. The District has the clinical setting, supervision and equipment needed by CSUN trainees as part of their practical learning experience.
ALTERNATIVES:
RECOMMENDATION:
Alternative #1.
RATIONALE:
The District wishes to continue to collaborate with California State University, Northridge, in the educational process of future teachers.
Respectfully submitted and prepared by,
Mark W McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Interim Superintendent
MWM:sf
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve amendments to Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 5141.21 – Administering Medication and Monitoring Health Conditions?
BACKGROUND:
Amendments in policy and regulation delete requirements related to the administration of medication in cases of epileptic seizures, as Education Code 49414.7 was repealed by its own terms on January 1, 2017. Districts may continue to administer such medication under the general authority. Because of new law AB 1386, this regulation also revises the definition of epinephrine auto-injector.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve amendments to Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 5141.21 – Administering Medication and Monitoring Health Conditions, as submitted.
2. Approve amendments to Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 5141.21 – Administering Medication and Monitoring Health Conditions, as amended.
3. Do not approve amendments to Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 5141.21 – Administering Medication and Monitoring Health Conditions, as submitted.
RECOMMENDATION:
Alternative 1
RATIONALE:
These amendments will keep our board policies and administrative regulations current with new law.
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Interim Superintendent
Prepared by:
Robert Iezza, Deputy Superintendent
Instructional Services
MWM:RI:ab
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve new Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 5141.6 – School Health Services?
BACKGROUND:
Currently, Conejo Valley Unified School District does not have School Health Services reflected in the District’s policies or regulations. Board approval will remedy the situation and our policy, regulations and current practice with state law.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve new Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 5141.6 – School Health Services, as submitted.
2. Approve new Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 5141.6 – School Health Services, as amended.
3. Do not approve new Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 5141.6 – School Health Services, as submitted.
RECOMMENDATION:
Alternative 1
RATIONALE:
This new policy and regulation will align our board policies and practices with current law.
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Interim Superintendent
Prepared by:
Robert Iezza, Deputy Superintendent
Instructional Services
MWM:RI:ab
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve the 2016-17 Unaudited Actual Financial Report for the General Fund and Ancillary Funds?
BACKGROUND:
The District officially closes the fiscal year as of June 30 each year and subsequently finalizes all of the District's financial operations. Statements are prepared showing the District's actual income and expenditures as of June 30, 2017. This is known as the Unaudited Financial Report.
ALTERNATIVES:
RECOMMENDATION:
Alternative #1.
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Interim Superintendent
Prepared by:
Susan Tucker
Director, Fiscal Services, on behalf of
Victor P. Hayek, Ed.D.
Assistant Superintendent, Business Services
MWM:VPH:ST:dbm
These items are considered routine and will be approved in one action without discussion.
If Board members request that an item be removed from Consent or a citizen wishes to speak
to an item, the item will be considered under Action Items.
Approval of the Minutes:
1. Certificated Service:
A. Employment/appointment: Administrators, Regular/Special Education Teachers
Orders #: R17-342 - R17-351
B. Retirements/resignations: Regular/ Special Education Teachers
Orders #: R17-352 - R17-353
2. Certificated Service – Exempt:
A. Employment/appointment: Exempt Specialists
Order #: E17-004
3. Classified Service:
A. Establishment / Modification / Elimination of Positions
Orders #: C17-103 - C17-104
B. New Employment (Prob to Perm) / Assignment Change / Change in Status
Orders #: C17-105 - C17-140
C. Substitute / Provisional / Additional Assignment / Change in Status
Orders #: C17-141 - C17-147
4. Classified Service - Exempt:
A. Walk-on Coach
Orders #: E17-119 - E17-138
B. Campus Supervisor, Proctor, Specialist, Student Helper, Others
Orders #: E17-139 - E17-227
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve a continuing contract for a nonpublic school placement for student #2-17/18?
BACKGROUND:
The needs of student #2-17/18 cannot be met by the public schools at this time.
In order to provide placement of this student at the recommended educational setting, a contract number must be established for the period of 7/1/17 through 6/30/2018. Total cost for this nonpublic school placement is $37,476.00, less reimbursement (from SELPA Mental Health Fund) of $0.00, and less District income of $10,694.50. The Total District Cost is $26,781.50.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve a continuing contract for the recommended nonpublic school placement for this student.
2. Do not approve a continuing contract for the recommended nonpublic school placement for this student.
RECOMMENDATION:
Alternative #1
RATIONALE:
Special Education classes and services for students by the District and County cannot meet the needs of this student. The District staff will review the student's Individual Education Plan during the period of the contract to determine if goals and objectives can be met in a public school program. This process guarantees the student's right to the least restrictive setting.
Respectfully submitted:
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D
Interim Superintendent
Prepared by:
Lisa Miller, Director of Special Education for
Robert Iezza, Deputy Superintendent, Instructional Services
MWM:RI:LM:ks
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve a continuing contract for a nonpublic school placement for student #3-17/18?
BACKGROUND:
The needs of student #3-17/18 cannot be met by the public schools at this time.
In order to provide placement of this student at the recommended educational setting, a contract number must be established for the period of 7/1/17 through 6/30/2018. Total cost for this nonpublic school placement is $31,136.00, less reimbursement (from SELPA Mental Health Fund) of $0.00, and less District income of $10,694.50. The Total District Cost is $20,441.50.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve a continuing contract for the recommended nonpublic school placement for this student.
2. Do not approve a continuing contract for the recommended nonpublic school placement for this student.
RECOMMENDATION:
Alternative #1
RATIONALE:
Special Education classes and services for students by the District and County cannot meet the needs of this student. The District staff will review the student's Individual Education Plan during the period of the contract to determine if goals and objectives can be met in a public school program. This process guarantees the student's right to the least restrictive setting.
Respectfully submitted:
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D
Interim Superintendent
Prepared by:
Lisa Miller, Director of Special Education for
Robert Iezza, Deputy Superintendent, Instructional Services
MWM:RI:LM:ks
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve a continuing contract for a nonpublic school placement for student #4-17/18?
BACKGROUND:
The needs of student #4-17/18 cannot be met by the public schools at this time.
In order to provide placement of this student at the recommended educational setting, a contract number must be established for the period of 7/1/2017 through 6/30/2018. Total cost for this nonpublic school placement is $38,428.95, less reimbursement (from SELPA Mental Health Fund) of $0.00, and less District income of $10,694.50. The Total District Cost is $27,734.45.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve a continuing contract for the recommended nonpublic school placement for this student.
2. Do not approve a continuing contract for the recommended nonpublic school placement for this student.
RECOMMENDATION:
Alternative #1
RATIONALE:
Special Education classes and services for students by the District and County cannot meet the needs of this student. The District staff will review the student's Individual Education Plan during the period of the contract to determine if goals and objectives can be met in a public school program. This process guarantees the student's right to the least restrictive setting.
Respectfully submitted:
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D
Interim Superintendent
Prepared by:
Lisa Miller, Director of Special Education for
Robert Iezza, Deputy Superintendent, Instructional Services
MWM:RI:LM:ks
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve a continuing contract for a nonpublic school placement for student #5-17/18?
BACKGROUND:
The needs of student #5-17/18 cannot be met by the public schools at this time.
In order to provide placement of this student at the recommended educational setting, a contract number must be established for the period of 7/1/2017 through 10/02/2017. Total cost for this nonpublic school placement is $29,448.00, less reimbursement (from SELPA Mental Health Fund) of $20,680.00, and less District income of $2,754.20. The Total District Cost is $6,013.80.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve a continuing contract for the recommended nonpublic school placement for this student.
2. Do not approve a continuing contract for the recommended nonpublic school placement for this student.
RECOMMENDATION:
Alternative #1
RATIONALE:
Special Education classes and services for students by the District and County cannot meet the needs of this student. The District staff will review the student's Individual Education Plan during the period of the contract to determine if goals and objectives can be met in a public school program. This process guarantees the student's right to the least restrictive setting.
Respectfully submitted:
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D
Interim Superintendent
Prepared by:
Lisa Miller, Director of Special Education for
Robert Iezza, Deputy Superintendent, Instructional Services
MWM:RI:LM:ks
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve a continuing contract for a nonpublic school placement for student #6-17/18?
BACKGROUND:
The needs of student #6-17/18 cannot be met by the public schools at this time.
In order to provide placement of this student at the recommended educational setting, a contract number must be established for the period of 7/1/2017 through 6/30/2018. Total cost for this nonpublic school placement is $35,469.60, less reimbursement (from SELPA Mental Health Fund) of $0.00, and less District income of $10,694.50. The Total District Cost is $24,775.10.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve a continuing contract for the recommended nonpublic school placement for this student.
2. Do not approve a continuing contract for the recommended nonpublic school placement for this student.
RECOMMENDATION:
Alternative #1
RATIONALE:
Special Education classes and services for students by the District and County cannot meet the needs of this student. The District staff will review the student's Individual Education Plan during the period of the contract to determine if goals and objectives can be met in a public school program. This process guarantees the student's right to the least restrictive setting.
Respectfully submitted:
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D
Interim Superintendent
Prepared by:
Lisa Miller, Director of Special Education for
Robert Iezza, Deputy Superintendent, Instructional Services
MWM:RI:LM:ks
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve a continuing contract for a nonpublic school placement for student #7-17/18?
BACKGROUND:
The needs of student #7-17/18 cannot be met by the public schools at this time.
In order to provide placement of this student at the recommended educational setting, a contract number must be established for the period of 7/1/2017 through 6/30/2018. Total cost for this nonpublic school placement is $34,419.00, less reimbursement (from SELPA Mental Health Fund) of $0.00, and less District income of $10,694.50. The Total District Cost is $23,724.50.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve a continuing contract for the recommended nonpublic school placement for this student.
2. Do not approve a continuing contract for the recommended nonpublic school placement for this student.
RECOMMENDATION:
Alternative #1
RATIONALE:
Special Education classes and services for students by the District and County cannot meet the needs of this student. The District staff will review the student's Individual Education Plan during the period of the contract to determine if goals and objectives can be met in a public school program. This process guarantees the student's right to the least restrictive setting.
Respectfully submitted:
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D
Interim Superintendent
Prepared by:
Lisa Miller, Director of Special Education for
Robert Iezza, Deputy Superintendent, Instructional Services
MWM:RI:LM:ks
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve a continuing contract for a nonpublic school placement for student #8-17/18?
BACKGROUND:
The needs of student #8-17/18 cannot be met by the public schools at this time.
In order to provide placement of this student at the recommended educational setting, a contract number must be established for the period of 7/1/2017 through 6/30/2018. Total cost for this nonpublic school placement is $32,427.60, less reimbursement (from SELPA Mental Health Fund) of $0.00, and less District income of $10,694.50. The Total District Cost is $21,733.10.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve a continuing contract for the recommended nonpublic school placement for this student.
2. Do not approve a continuing contract for the recommended nonpublic school placement for this student.
RECOMMENDATION:
Alternative #1
RATIONALE:
Special Education classes and services for students by the District and County cannot meet the needs of this student. The District staff will review the student's Individual Education Plan during the period of the contract to determine if goals and objectives can be met in a public school program. This process guarantees the student's right to the least restrictive setting.
Respectfully submitted:
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D
Interim Superintendent
Prepared by:
Lisa Miller, Director of Special Education for
Robert Iezza, Deputy Superintendent, Instructional Services
MWM:RI:LM:ks
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve a contract for a nonpublic school placement for student #9-17/18?
BACKGROUND:
The needs of student #9-17/18 cannot be met by the public schools at this time.
In order to provide placement of this student at the recommended educational setting, a contract number must be established for the period of 7/10/2017 through 9/30/2017. Total cost for this nonpublic school placement is $7,007.31, less reimbursement (from SELPA Mental Health Fund) of $0.00, and less District income of $1,318.50. The Total District Cost is $5,688.81.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve a contract for the recommended nonpublic school placement for this student.
2. Do not approve a contract for the recommended nonpublic school placement for this student.
RECOMMENDATION:
Alternative #1
RATIONALE:
Special Education classes and services for students by the District and County cannot meet the needs of this student. The District staff will review the student's Individual Education Plan during the period of the contract to determine if goals and objectives can be met in a public school program. This process guarantees the student's right to the least restrictive setting.
Respectfully submitted:
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D
Interim Superintendent
Prepared by:
Lisa Miller, Director of Special Education for
Robert Iezza, Deputy Superintendent, Instructional Services
MWM:RI:LM:ks
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve an overnight trip for the Thousand Oaks High School Journalism and Yearbook Club to attend the National Scholastic Press Association Convention?
BACKGROUND:
The Thousand Oaks High School Journalism and Yearbook Club requests permission to take 16 students to the National Scholastic Press Association Convention in Dallas, Texas, from November 15, 2017, to November 19, 2017. Journalism Advisor Tasha Beaudoin and Yearbook Advisor Joanna Burns will accompany the students. The group will travel 1,477 miles to Dallas, Texas by airplane and return via airplane. The students will miss three full day of school on Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday. Students will be required to receive their teachers’ permission prior to leaving on the trip. This trip will be paid for through fundraising and a JEA/NSPA scholarship. No student will be excluded from participation due to a lack of sufficient funds.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve the overnight trip request, as submitted.
2. Do not approve the overnight trip, as submitted.
RECOMMENDATION:
Alternative 1
RATIONALE:
The Thousand Oaks High School Journalism and Yearbook Club will attend one-hour workshops from 9:00am – 3:00pm each day of the convention. They will also participate in a write-off competition sponsored by the Journalism Education Association. Trips of this type have been approved in the past.
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Interim Superintendent
Prepared by:
Dr. James Garza, Director, Secondary Education for
Robert Iezza, Deputy Superintendent
Instructional Services
MWM:RI:JG:ss
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve the attached addendum to the Annual Signature Authorization 2017/2018?
BACKGROUND:
Education Code Section 42633 requires that the governing board of each school district file with the county superintendent of schools the verified signature of each person, including members of the governing board, authorized to sign orders in its name. School districts must declare the authorized agents to sign orders, warrants, contracts, documents, etc.
A list of recommended authorized agents listing their areas of authorization was approved by the Board of Education on June 20, 2017. On August 15, 2017, the Board approved an addendum. The attached addendum adds the recently hired Director of Purchasing Services and Director of Technology Services to the list of authorized signatures.
ALTERNATIVES:
RECOMMENDATION:
Alternative No. 1.
RATIONALE:
Compliance with Education Code Section 21104 is required in order to continue to conduct District business.
Respectfully submitted by,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Interim Superintendent
Prepared by:
Victor P. Hayek, Ed.D.
Assistant Superintendent, Business Services
MWM:VPH:dm
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education authorize the execution and filing of a Notice of Completion for the contract with Jeff Painting, for the exterior painting project at Conejo Valley Unified School District Offices and Conejo Valley High School?
BACKGROUND:
On July 18, 2017, the Conejo Valley Unified School District entered into a contract with Jeff Painting, for the exterior painting project at Conejo Valley Unified School District Offices, and Conejo Valley High School, under the guidelines of California Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act (CUPCCAA). The projects, DO-17M1040, in the amount of $33,300; and MP17/18-14-CVH, in the amount of $44,400 are complete and have been inspected by District staff. The project has been funded by Developer Donation and Measure I funds, under Purchase Order B18-00674.
ALTERNATIVES:
RECOMMENDATION:
Alternative #1
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Interim Superintendent
Prepared by,
Tim McCabe
Director, Planning and Construction, on behalf of
Victor P. Hayek, Ed.D.
Assistant Superintendent, Business Services
MWM:VPH:TM:dmh
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education authorize the execution and filing of a Notice of Completion for the contract with School Specialty, for the classroom furniture installation project at Conejo Valley High School?
BACKGROUND:
On June 9, 2017, the Conejo Valley Unified School District entered into a contract with School Specialty for the purchase of classroom furniture and installation at Conejo Valley High School, under the guidelines of California Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act (CUPCCAA). The project, MP17/18-14-CVH, in the amount of $27,906.98 is complete and has been inspected by District staff. The project has been funded by Measure I funds, under Purchase Order B18-00508.
ALTERNATIVES:
RECOMMENDATION:
Alternative #1
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Interim Superintendent
Prepared by,
Tim McCabe
Director, Planning and Construction, on behalf of
Victor P. Hayek, Ed.D.
Assistant Superintendent, Business Services
MWM:VPH:TM:dmh
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve Purchase Order Report #928?
BACKGROUND:
Attached is Purchase Order Report #928, which includes Purchase Orders for the period of August 16, 2017, through August 31, 2017. Purchase Orders have been approved by an administrator as a necessary expense for the instructional or support program. The purchase is budgeted for and within the budget authorization of the account.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve Purchase Order Report #928, as submitted.
2. Do not approve Purchase Order Report #928.
RECOMMENDATION:
Alternative #1
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Interim Superintendent
Prepared by,
Victor P. Hayek, Ed.D.
Assistant Superintendent, Business Services
MWM:VPH:kg
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education approve the disposal of surplus and obsolete equipment?
BACKGROUND:
The items listed on the attached pages are surplus or obsolete. Some items have become unserviceable and/or cost more to repair than they are worth. Governing Board Policy 3270, Sale and Disposal of Personal Property, authorizes the Purchasing Services Coordinator to advertise, sell, auction, dispose or donate obsolete and surplus district-owned personal property per the attached list. Unless otherwise directed, any proceeds from sale of items will be deposited to the general fund.
ALTERNATIVES:
RECOMMENDATION:
Alternative #1
RATIONALE:
Education Code #17545 requires approval by the Board of Education prior to disposal of surplus and obsolete equipment.
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Interim Superintendent
Prepared by,
Victor P. Hayek, Ed.D.
Assistant Superintendent, Business Services
MWM:VPH:kg
ISSUE:
Should the Board of Education adopt a proclamation declaring October 23 through October 31, 2017, as Red Ribbon Week in the Conejo Valley Unified School District?
BACKGROUND:
Californians launched the Red Ribbon campaign in 1985 for Drug Free Youth. The purpose of the campaign is to draw attention to the need to eliminate the demand for illegal drugs. Red Ribbon Week also provides an opportunity to discuss drug-free choices and positively model for students by encouraging parents, staff, and students to wear symbolic red ribbons.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Adopt the attached Red Ribbon Week Proclamation #17/18-03.
2. Do not adopt the attached Red Ribbon Week Proclamation #17/18-03.
RECOMMENDATION:
Alternative #1
RATIONALE:
Support and observation of Red Ribbon Week is consistent with the District’s priority for the prevention of substance abuse.
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Interim Superintendent
Prepared by:
Robert Iezza, Deputy Superintendent
Instructional Services
MWM:RI:ab
ISSUE:
The Conejo Valley Unified School District (CVUSD) leadership team intends to regularly brief the Board of Education (Board) on progress related to Conejo Valley High School (CVHS) and District Office (DO) relocation projects.
BACKGROUND:
At its March 14, 2017 Discussion Session, the Board sought information on fiscal, facility and programmatic features associated with relocating CVHS. The proposal to move CVHS to the South Building on Janss Road would necessitate relocating select district offices while renovating other buildings on Janss Road. Impending projects will be phased, so it is important to staff that regular updates on processes, budgets and progress are provided to the Board.
RATIONALE:
The CVUSD leadership team wishes to be proactive and transparent in keeping the Board and community informed.
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Interim Superintendent
Prepared by:
Mark McLaughlin, Ed.D.
Interim Superintendent
MWM
FUTURE BOARD MEETINGS
OCTOBER 3, 2017
OCTOBER 17, 2017
NOVEMBER 7, 2017
NOVEMBER 21, 2017
DECEMBER 5, 2017
DECEMBER 19, 2017
5:00 p.m. Closed Session
6:00 p.m. Open Session
Location: 1402 E. Janss Road (Board Room located in CVHS), Thousand Oaks
For a copy of this agenda and additional information, please visit the CVUSD website.
Internet Home Page: www.conejousd.org/
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
In compliance with the ADA, if you need special assistance, including assisted listening devices, to participate in this meeting or other services in conjunction with this meeting, please contact the Superintendent’s Office at (805) 497-9511 ext. 201. Upon request, the agenda and documents in this agenda packet can be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist our staff in assuring reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service.