Oral Public Comments

The Board welcomes public comments.  To comment on non-agenda items, please submit a speaker form (blue card) to the recording secretary prior to the Public Comments section of the agenda.  To comment on an agenda item, please submit a speaker form (blue card) to the recording secretary prior to the Action portion of the agenda.  Filling out the speaker cards is voluntary, but will assist the Board in efficiently running the meeting.  Public comments are limited to three minutes per speaker.  If there are numerous persons wishing to make public comments, the President of the Board may decrease the amount of time allotted for each speaker.  Please present your comments in a factual and respectful manner.  Participants engaging in disorderly conduct may be ordered to leave the meeting.  Finally, please be advised that except in limited situations the Board cannot enter into a formal discussion or make a decision in regard to any item not appearing on the agenda.  However, the Board or staff may briefly respond to comments or questions from the public; ask clarification questions or make announcements; direct staff to place an item on a future agenda; request staff to report on an issue at a future meeting, or provide reference to staff or otherwise inform members of the public where they can locate additional sources of factual information.

Written Public Comments

If you wish to register your opinion on an item, but not speak, you may fill out a public written statement form (yellow card), and hand it to the recording secretary.  Board members will review these forms after the meeting.  The information on these cards will be become a part of the public record.

1.  TOHS Girls Basketball – CIF 3-AA Division Champions

2.  WHS Girls Soccer – Marmonte League Champions

Oral Public Comments

The Board welcomes public comments.  To comment on non-agenda items, please submit a speaker form (blue card) to the recording secretary prior to the Public Comments section of the agenda.  To comment on an agenda item, please submit a speaker form (blue card) to the recording secretary prior to the Action portion of the agenda.  Filling out the speaker cards is voluntary, but will assist the Board in efficiently running the meeting.  Public comments are limited to three minutes per speaker.  If there are numerous persons wishing to make public comments, the President of the Board may decrease the amount of time allotted for each speaker.  Please present your comments in a factual and respectful manner.  Participants engaging in disorderly conduct may be ordered to leave the meeting.  Finally, please be advised that except in limited situations the Board cannot enter into a formal discussion or make a decision in regard to any item not appearing on the agenda.  However, the Board or staff may briefly respond to comments or questions from the public; ask clarification questions or make announcements; direct staff to place an item on a future agenda; request staff to report on an issue at a future meeting, or provide reference to staff or otherwise inform members of the public where they can locate additional sources of factual information.

Written Public Comments

If you wish to register your opinion on an item, but not speak, you may fill out a public written statement form (yellow card), and hand it to the recording secretary.  Board members will review these forms after the meeting.  The information on these cards will be become a part of the public record.

               Pursuant to the Brown Act, the Board of Education cannot enter into formal

               discussion with individuals making public comments to the Board.  The Board cannot

               take action on any issues raised during public comments that are not on the meeting

               agenda.  Individual Board members may respond to public comments during the

               Individual Board Member’s Comments section of the agenda.

               Pursuant to the Brown Act, the Board of Education cannot enter into formal

               discussion with individuals making public comments to the Board.  The Board cannot

               take action on any issues raised during public comments that are not on the meeting

               agenda.  Individual Board members may respond to public comments during the

               Individual Board Member’s Comments section of the agenda.

ISSUE:

Should the Board of Education approve amendment of Administrative Regulation 4032 – Reasonable Accommodation?

BACKGROUND:

CVUSD receives periodic updates to Board Policies and Administrative Regulations from GAMUT. GAMUT is a policy update service offered through the California School Boards Association (CSBA) which provides information about new laws and court opinions which may affect Board Policies, Administrative Regulations, and Board Bylaws.

The amendment of Administrative Regulation 4032 reflects an update to Government Code 12940, as amended by AB 987 (Ch. 122, Statues of 2015).  This amendment designates the position specified in Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 4030 – Nondiscrimination in Employment, as the coordinator of its efforts to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and to investigate any and all related complaints.  All new language is indicated as bold font and deleted language as strikeouts in the attached documents.

ALTERNATIVES:

1. Approve the amendment of Administrative Regulation 4032 – Reasonable Accommodation, as submitted.
2. Approve the amendment of Administrative Regulation 4032 – Reasonable Accommodation, as revised.
3. Do not approve the amendment of Administrative Regulation 4032 – Reasonable Accommodation.

RECOMMENDATION:

 
Alternative #1

RATIONALE:

The recommended updated Administrative Regulation is in compliance with current law.

Respectfully submitted,

Ann N. Bonitatibus, Ed.D.

Superintendent

Prepared by,

Mark McLaughlin, Ed.D.

Assistant Superintendent, Human Resources

ANB:MM:sf

ISSUE:

Should the Board of Education approve the amendment of Board Policy 4040 – Employee Use of Technology?

BACKGROUND:

CVUSD receives periodic updates to Board Policies and Administrative Regulations from GAMUT. GAMUT is a policy update service offered through the California School Boards Association (CSBA) which provides information about new laws and court opinions which may affect Board Policies, Administrative Regulations, and Board Bylaws.

The amendment of Board Policy 4040 reflects the deletion of the outdated section on the use of cell phone or mobile communications devices and clarifies that the use of a password does not give an employee a reasonable expectation of privacy.  This amendment also clarifies the District’s responsibility regarding the accessing and posting of harmful matter and employees’ responsibility to report security problems or misuse of district technology.  All new language is indicated as bold font and deleted language as strikeouts in the attached documents.

ALTERNATIVES:

1. Approve the amendment of Board Policy 4040 – Employee Use of Technology, as submitted.
2. Approve the amendment of Board Policy 4040 – Employee Use of Technology, as revised.
3. Do not approve the amendment of Board Policy 4040 – Employee Use of Technology.

RECOMMENDATION:

Alternative #1.

RATIONALE:

The recommended updated Board Policy is in compliance with current law.

Respectfully submitted,

Ann N. Bonitatibus, Ed.D.

Superintendent

Prepared by,

Mark McLaughlin, Ed.D.

Assistant Superintendent, Human Resources

ANB:MM:sf

ISSUE:

Should the Board of Education approve the Career-Applied Technology Carl Perkins Education Grant for 2017/2018?

BACKGROUND:

The purpose of the Carl D. Perkins Vocational and Technical Education Act of 1998, P.L. 105-332, is to assist local education agencies in conducting applied technology education programs/services.  These programs are directly related to the preparation of students for employment or advanced training in vocational fields upon graduation and are conducted at the high school level through the Career-Applied Technology Education Department, as well as the Career Centers and Work Experience programs.  In order to comply with the provisions of the laws governing Career-Applied Technology Education funds, the acceptance of grant funding must be approved by the Board of Education of the local education agency.  The funding is as follows:

Title I, Part C, Section 131 - Secondary Education - $95,138.00

ALTERNATIVES:

1.  Approve the Career–Applied Technology Education Grant application for 2017/2018.

2.  Do not approve the Career–Applied Technology Education Grant application for 2017/2018.

RECOMMENDATION:

Alternative 1.

RATIONALE:

Approval of the 2017/2018 application will make available to the CVUSD $95,138.00 to expand, improve and create career-applied technology education programs for high school students. The Board has approved this type of request in the past.  

Respectfully submitted,

Ann N. Bonitatibus, Ed.D.

Superintendent

Prepared by:

Dr. James Garza, Director, Secondary Education for

Robert Iezza, Deputy Superintendent

Instructional Services

ANB:RI:JG:ss

ISSUE:

Should the Board of Education approve the elimination of infant and toddler program services at the Neighborhood for Learning City Center?

BACKGROUND:

Neighborhood for Learning / City Center

The District operates programs for children of ages 0-5 under the umbrella of two programs, Neighborhood for Learning (NfL) and Wonder Preschool (2.9mo-5years). The Neighborhood for Learning programs are located at EARThS, Park Oaks Elementary, University Center, and City Center, located at 110 Conejo School Road, across from The Lakes. Staff have been presented with fiscal challenges almost on a yearly basis relative to balancing the budget for operating the Neighborhood for Learning associated programs, resulting in frequent position staff restructuring proposals in an effort to remain solvent and not dependent upon General Fund support. In 2015-2016, staff brought forward staffing reductions that yielded approximately $80,000 in annual cost saving, but the reductions were insufficient in balancing the 2016-2017 operational budget. It was necessary to shift funds from a separate enterprise fund, in order to cover the 2016-2017 balance deficit, with the Child Care enterprise fund subsidizing nearly $200,000 of NfL’s deficit.

Proposal of Elimination of Infant and Toddler Services:

Staff has closely examined operational costs of each and every program, and have turned to examining the feasibility of operating the infant and toddler programs given the recurring fiscal losses incurred by these two services. The State licensing regulations mandate strict staffing ratios due to the age of the children served, resulting in a significant staffing expense that far exceeds the revenue collected from tuition fees. However, staff does not believe that a part-time employee staffing model, at a lesser cost, would be appropriate to consider, as it would compromise continuity of care which is imperative to maintain for the infant and toddler age children. As the projected loss associated with these two services in 2017-2018 is projected to be approximately $100,000, staff proposes to eliminate services for infants and toddlers at the City Center, effective July 1, 2017. 

At the Board meeting on February 21, 2017, the Board of Education requested additional information including, but not limited to: Program descriptions, and budgetary information for each program.  Additionally, NfL staff was directed to meet with a committee of concerned parents to discuss possible alternatives to elimination of the Market Rate infant and toddler programs. The committee met four times in the month of March – March 9, 15, 20 and 22.  As a result of the budgetary appraisal and associated committee efforts, two alternative proposals surfaced that may address program sustainability.

At the Board meeting on April 4, 2017, Amie Mills, Director, Child Development, brought forth a presentation on four proposals created by the Infant/Toddler Committee. Upon the Committee's recommendation of Proposal #2, the Board collectively directed staff to move this forward as an Action Item on April 18 ,2017, for the approval of Proposal #2.

ALTERNATIVES:

        1.          Approve Proposal #1 - Increase NfL Market Rate Infant & Toddler tuition by 30 percent.

        2.          Approve Proposal #2 - Increase NfL Market Rate Infant & Toddler tuition by 25.5 percent with staffing adjustments.

        3.          Approve the elimination of NfL infant and toddler program services effective July 1, 2017.      

        4.          Do not approve alternatives #1, #2 or #3 and maintain NfL infant and toddler program services in its current status.

RECOMMENDATION:

Alternative #2.

RATIONALE:

Fee increase adjustments or program elimination are necessary to balance the 2017-2018 NfL Market Rate / City Center program budget limiting the certain need for General Fund support. Moreover, the proposed fee increases or elimination of infant and toddler services will sustain and ensure the quality of other existing NfL programs.

Respectfully submitted,

Ann N. Bonitatibus, Ed.D.

Superintendent

Prepared by:

Robert Iezza, Deputy Superintendent, Instructional Services

ANB:RI:ab:hi

ISSUE:

The District has a responsibility to annually evaluate all fees that are charged to students, parents, community members, connected organizations, and other stakeholders. 

BACKGROUND:

Conejo Valley Unified School District meal prices have not been adjusted since 2010-2011.  A 2016 School Services of California, Inc. report on the food service program brought to our attention that the "ala carte" food offerings are priced considerably below comparable commercial food items.  Therefore, individual item prices should be adjusted to be fair and competitive.  Full meal prices would remain at their existing rate.

ALTERNATIVES:

1. Approve no change to paid school meal pricing and revise ala carte menu, as submitted.
2. Approve no change to paid school meal pricing and revise ala carte menu, as amended.
3. Do not approve no change to paid school meal pricing and revised ala carte menu.

RECOMMENDATION:

Alternative #1

RATIONALE:

No adjustment of paid school meal prices is necessary, however, the revision of the ala carte menu will make CVUSD consistent with comparable school pricing.  Adjustment of the ala carte menu will increase purchases of nutritious school meals and reimbursement from federal and state governments.

Respectfully submitted,

Ann N. Bonitatibus, Ed.D.

Superintendent

Prepared by,

Virginia Beck, Director, Child Nutrition Program on behalf of

Victor P. Hayek, Ed.D., Assistant Superintendent, Business Services

ANB:VPH:VB:ga

ISSUE:

The District has a responsibility to annually evaluate all fees that are charged to students, parents, community members, connected organizations, and other stakeholders. 

BACKGROUND:

The Board of Education previously revised the District's Civic Center fee schedule on May 21, 2013, for the 2013-14 school year.  Prior to that, fees were increased by 5% annually for 10 years through the 2013-14 school year. District costs for labor, supplies, and other related materials associated with facilities increase each year.  Uncertainty in State funding, declining enrollment and rising costs require annual review of fees to ensure non-instructional programs do not take support away from instructional programs. 

Separate facility use agreements will continue to be entered into for groups that benefit our community who will be using large blocks of facilities for an extended period of time.

ALTERNATIVES:

1. Approve the Civic Center application fee to $20 and the fee Schedule for the 2017-18 school year with a 10% increase.
2. Approve the Civic Center application fee to $20 and the fee Schedule for the 2017-18 school year with a different increase.
3. Approve the Civic Center Fee Schedule for the 2017-18 school year, with no increase.

RECOMMENDATION:

Alternative #1

RATIONALE:

The Civic Center fee schedule should be reviewed and revised annually to reflect rising operating costs and give the district funds to keep our facilities maintained.   

Respectfully submitted,

Ann N. Bonitatibus, Ed.D.

Superintendent

Prepared by,

Victor P. Hayek, Ed.D.

Assistant Superintendent, Business Services

ANB:VPH:ga

ISSUE:

The District has a responsibility to annually evaluate all fees that are charged to students, parents, community members, connected organizations, and other stakeholders. 

BACKGROUND:

On April 23, 1992, the Board of Education approved the establishment of a parent-pay pupil transportation system for home-to-school transportation services.  The program was established with tiered payment options.  A full-fare was established, while parents or guardians who are determined eligible according to State of California Food Stamp and Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) criteria were offered free or reduced transportation services.

The District has not increased bus fees since June 1994.  Fees should be reviewed annually and any adjustments made should be finalized by the Spring of the prior year in order to provide ample time to notify parents.  Proposed fees represent an approximate 10% adjustment.   

There are approximately 530-580 students taking advantage of the program with 70% free-eligible, 7% at the reduced rate, and 23% paying the full fare.  

Note: The District will continue to provide transportation for specified special education students at no cost to parents.

ALTERNATIVES:

1. Approve the revised parent-pay fee schedule for 2017-18.
2. Approve the parent-pay fee schedule at an amended rate increase for 2017-18.
3. Do not adjust the parent-pay fee schedule for 2017-18.

RECOMMENDATION:

Alternative #1

RATIONALE:

The parent-pay program provides a safe and reliable option for parents to get their children to school while generating revenue for the general fund to help offset transportation costs.  It also allows the district to maximize busing efficiency by placing students in unfilled seats. 

Respectfully submitted,

Ann N. Bonitatibus, Ed.D.

Superintendent

Prepared by,

Victor P. Hayek, Ed.D.

Assistant Superintendent, Business Services

ANB:VPH:ST:JB:ga

ISSUE:

Should the Board of Education (Board) approve a Facilities Use Agreement with the Conejo Recreation and Park District (CRPD) for futsal courts at Los Cerritos Middle School?

BACKGROUND:

Education Code Sections 10900, et seq., authorize districts having powers to provide recreation, and cities, counties, and school districts to organize, promote, and conduct joint programs of community recreation, inclusive of constructing and improving recreation centers within and without their territorial limits.  CRPD would like to convert three existing tennis courts located at Los Cerritos Middle School property to a multipurpose use, including tennis and futsal, and operate community recreation programs on the courts after school hours.  As reported to the Board at its regularly scheduled meeting on April 4, 2017, futsal is similar to soccer, but utilizes a hard court similar to a tennis court. 

Conejo Valley Unified School District (CVUSD) and CRPD previously discussed a joint use agreement for the courts.  The attached Facilities Use Agreement would supersede and replace in its entirety the prior agreement, which was executed in June 2015.  The attached Facilities Use Agreement provides that CRPD will be solely responsible for funding and constructing the improvements, which includes resurfacing and restriping three of the seven existing asphalt tennis courts at Los Cerritos Middle School; adding six lights to the courts (while leaving the existing two lights in place), adding fencing between two courts, installing a small cargo container for storage of equipment, and creating a new accessible walkway from the disabled parking location to the existing tennis court access gate.  CRPD has already obtained Division of State Architect approval of the project plans.

The attached Facilities Use Agreement also provides that CVUSD would have priority use of the three courts, including full use of the three courts during school hours.  CRPD would have access to the courts from 4:30 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, and 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. on weekends, holidays, and days when school is not in session, pursuant to an annual schedule provided to CVUSD.  CRPD would assume all maintenance and expenses related to use of the courts.  The term is for 10 years, with the possibility of up to two five-year extensions.  The revised agreement includes updated provisions (e.g., current insurance and indemnity provisions).  The agreement must be approved by the governing boards of CVUSD and CRPD.  CRPD anticipates considering this matter at its board meeting on April 20, 2017.

ALTERNATIVES:

1. Approve Facilities Use Agreement, as submitted.
2. Approve Facilities Use Agreement, subject to amendments or revisions.
3. Do not approve Facilities Use Agreement.

RECOMMENDATION:

Alternative #1

RATIONALE:

The current version of the agreement includes updated terms and conditions.  The attached resolution also includes California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings and authorizes District administration to file a notice of exemption regarding the project.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

CRPD will pay for construction, regular maintenance and repair, and insurance.  During the term of the agreement, CRPD will use the improvement at no cost due to the fact that CRPD is funding the construction.  However, CRPD will pay electricity costs during CRPD’s usage. 

Respectfully submitted,

Ann N. Bonitatibus, Ed.D.

Superintendent

Prepared by,

Victor P. Hayek, Ed.D.

Assistant Superintendent, Business Services

ANB:VPH:ga

These items are considered routine and will be approved in one action without discussion.

If Board members request that an item be removed from Consent or a citizen wishes to speak

to an item, the item will be considered under Action Items.

Approval of the Minutes:

• Regular Meeting of April 4, 2017: Please click above (clock icon) to access the minutes.

1.  Certificated Service:
     A.  Employment / Layoff / Leave of Absence / Retirement / Resignation / Separation:  Teachers

          Orders #:  R16-244 - R16-247
 

2.  Certificated Service - Exempt:
     A.  Employment:  Teacher

          Orders #:  E16-188

3.  Classified Service:

     A.  New Employment (Probationary to Perm) / Assignment Change / Change in Status

          Orders #:  C16-487 - C16-500   
 
     B.  Substitute / Provisional / Additional Assignment

          Orders #:  C16-501 - C16-510
 

     C.  Establishment / Modification / Elimination of Positions
          Orders #:  No items
 

4.  Classified Service - Exempt:
     A.  Walk-on Coach
          Orders #:  E16-663 - E16-664

     B.  Campus Supervisor, Proctor, Specialist, Student Helper, Others

          Orders #:  E16-665 - E16-676

ISSUE:

Should the Board of Education award the bids for goods and supplies for the Child Nutrition program?

BACKGROUND:

Competitive bids were advertised, posted, received and evaluated for the Child Nutrition Program's goods and supplies for 2017-2018. Bids are awarded to the most responsive and responsible bidders that met contract and nutritional requirements, and were lowest in aggregated price.

ALTERNATIVES:

1. Approve the award of bids as presented.
2. Approve the award of bids as amended.
3. Do not approve the award of bids.                         

RECOMMENDATION:

Alternative #1

Respectfully submitted,

Ann N. Bonitatibus, Ed.D.

Superintendent

Prepared by,

Virginia K. Beck

Director, Child Nutrition Program

ANB:VPH:VKB

ISSUE:

Should the Board of Education approve the Quarterly Report on Williams Uniform Complaints for the quarter ending December 31, 2016?

BACKGROUND:

California Education Code §35186 requires that the Superintendent or designee report summarized data on the nature and resolution of all Williams Uniform Complaints on a quarterly basis to the Board of Education and the County Superintendent of Schools.  The attached Quarterly Report includes the number of complaints (zero) by general subject area with the number of resolved and unresolved complaints. 

ALTERNATIVES:

1. Approve the Quarterly Report on Williams Uniform Complaints for the quarter ending December 31, 2016.

2. Do not approve the Quarterly Report on Williams Uniform Complaints for the quarter ending December 31, 2016.

RECOMMENDATION:

Approve Alternative #1.

RATIONALE:

It is the policy of the Conejo Valley Unified School District to comply with federal and state laws and regulations governing educational programs or activities which receive state or federal funding.

Submitted by:

Ann N. Bonitatibus, Ed.D.

Superintendent

Prepared by:

Victor P. Hayek, Ed.D.

Assistant Superintendent, Business Services

ANB:VPH:ga

ISSUE:

Should the Board of Education approve Purchase Order Report #920?

BACKGROUND:

Attached is Purchase Order Report #920 which includes Purchase Orders for the period of March 28, 2017, through April 3, 2017.  Purchase Orders have been approved by an administrator as a necessary expense for the instructional or support program.  The purchase is budgeted for and within the budget authorization of the account.

ALTERNATIVES:

1. Approve Purchase Order Report #920
2. Do not approve Purchase Order Report #920

RECOMMENDATION:

Alternative #1

RATIONALE:

Ratification and approval of Purchase Orders from March 28, 2017, through April 3, 2017, is required.  The administrator responsible for the appropriate budget account has approved all purchase orders.

Respectfully submitted,

Ann N. Bonitatibus, Ed.D.

Superintendent

Prepared by,

Victor P. Hayek, Ed.D.

Assistant Superintendent, Business Services

ANB:VPH:ks

ISSUE:

Should the Board of Education approve the Technology Master Plan?

BACKGROUND:

Board Policy 0440 mandates that the Superintendent or designee shall develop a three to five-year technology plan.  Districts adopt Technology Plans in order to ensure quality educational outcomes when planning for the purchase, implementation, professional development, and use of technology.  This plan identifies four overarching goals that each school site will use in the design and ongoing updates to their three-year school technology plans.  The master plan also addresses the infrastructure and support needs required to utilize and maintain technology throughout the district.  A single plan that encompasses all aspects of technology vision, integration, the technology lifecycle, safety and security, and support needs is a necessary resource.

Jerome Staszewski, Director, Technology Services, will present the Technology Master Plan and be available for questions.

ALTERNATIVES:

1. Approve the Technology Master Plan, as submitted.
2. Approve the Technology Master Plan, as amended.
3. Do not approve the Technology Master Plan, as submitted.

RECOMMENDATION:

Alternative #1

RATIONALE:

The proposed Technology Master Plan reflects the District technology vision as clarified through stakeholder feedback.

Respectfully submitted,

Ann N. Bonitatibus, Ed.D.

Superintendent

Prepared by,

Jerome Staszewski, Director, Technology Services on behalf of

Victor P. Hayek, Ed.D., Assistant Superintendent, Business Services

ANB:VPH:JS:ga:hi

ISSUE:

The Conejo Valley Unified School District (CVUSD) leadership team intends to regularly brief the Board of Education (Board) on progress related to Conejo Valley High School (CVHS) and District Office (DO) relocation projects.

BACKGROUND:

At its March 14, 2017 Discussion Session, the Board sought information on fiscal, facility and programmatic features associated with relocating CVHS.  The proposal to move CVHS to the South Building on Janss Road would necessitate relocating select district offices while renovating other buildings on Janss Road.  Impending projects will be phased, so it is important to staff that regular updates on processes, budgets and progress are provided to the Board.

ALTERNATIVES:

Not applicable

RECOMMENDATION:

Not applicable

RATIONALE:

The CVUSD leadership team wishes to be proactive and transparent in keeping the Board and community informed.

Respectfully submitted,

Ann N. Bonitatibus, Ed.D.

Superintendent

Prepared by:

Ann N. Bonitatibus, Ed. D.

Superintendent

ANB

FUTURE BOARD MEETINGS

Tuesday, May 2, 2017

5:00 p.m. Closed Session

6:00 p.m. Open Session

Location: CVUSD District Office, 1400 E. Janss Road (South Building Board Room), Thousand Oaks, CA

AGENDAS ARE POSTED AT THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS

*CVUSD District Office, 1400 E. Janss Road, Thousand Oaks, CA

Newbury Park High School, 456 Reino Road, Newbury Park, CA

Thousand Oaks High School, 2323 Moorpark Road, Thousand Oaks, CA

Westlake High School, 100 N. Lakeview Canyon Road, Westlake Village, CA

CVUSD Grounds & Mechanics Office, 750 Mitchell Rd., Newbury Park, CA

*This serves as the main posting location pursuant to the Brown Act, Government Code §54954.2(a)

For a copy of this agenda and additional information, please visit the CVUSD website. Internet Home Page: www.conejousd.org/

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)

In compliance with the ADA, if you need special assistance, including assisted listening devices, to participate in this meeting or other services in conjunction with this meeting, please contact the Superintendent’s Office at (805) 497-9511 ext. 201. Upon request, the agenda and documents in this agenda packet can be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist our staff in assuring reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service.